Literature DB >> 29934926

Vulnerable Women's Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Erin Hetherington1, Suzanne Tough2,3, Deborah McNeil2,4,5, Hamideh Bayrampour6, Amy Metcalfe2,7.   

Abstract

Introduction Vulnerable pregnant women (e.g. women with low socio-economic status or recent immigrants) are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care or to attend perinatal education classes. CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a model of group prenatal care which combines assessment, education and support. This study aimed to assess patient experience among vulnerable women in group prenatal care compared to individual care. Methods Women participating in CP at a community-based health centre in urban Alberta were eligible to participate. A convenience sample of women who received individual care at a low-risk maternity clinic served as comparison. Women were asked a series of questions on their prenatal care experience. Demographic and patient responses were compared using Chi square, fisher's exact and t tests. Results Forty-five women accessing CP and 92 women accessing individual care participated. Women in CP were younger, more likely to be single and having their first baby than women in individual care. Women in CP were significantly more likely to report having received enough information on exercise during pregnancy (92 vs. 66%, p = 0.002), breastfeeding (95 vs. 70%, p = 0.002) and baby care (95 vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Women in CP were more likely to report that they felt their prenatal care providers were interested in how the pregnancy was affecting their life (100 vs. 93%, p ≤ 0.001). Discussion Group prenatal care provides a positive experience and improved information exchange among vulnerable populations. Programs interested in engaging, educating and empowering vulnerable pregnant women may benefit from implementation of group care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CenteringPregnancy; Patient experience; Prenatal care; Vulnerable women

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29934926     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-018-2559-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  41 in total

1.  Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: history, challenges, and directions for future research.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M Kotelchuck
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Comparison of selected outcomes of CenteringPregnancy versus traditional prenatal care.

Authors:  Karen A Baldwin
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.388

3.  The content of prenatal care and its relationship to preterm birth in Alberta, Canada.

Authors:  Deborah E White; Nonie J Fraser-Lee; Suzanne Tough; Christine V Newburn-Cook
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2006-10

4.  Effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial risk in pregnancy: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jeannette R Ickovics; Elizabeth Reed; Urania Magriples; Claire Westdahl; Sharon Schindler Rising; Trace S Kershaw
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2011-02

5.  Knowledge change associated with participation in prenatal education programs in Ontario: A cohort study.

Authors:  Katelyn M Godin; Gillian D Alton; Harshani P Gangodawilage; Theresa D Procter; Natalie B Bourdages; Susan E Blue; Sarah A Edwards; Melissa J Horan
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-03

Review 6.  Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both.

Authors:  A J Gagnon; J Sandall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

7.  Association between inadequate antenatal care utilisation and severe perinatal and maternal morbidity: an analysis in the PreCARE cohort.

Authors:  M Linard; B Blondel; C Estellat; C Deneux-Tharaux; D Luton; J F Oury; T Schmitz; L Mandelbrot; E Azria
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  A qualitative descriptive study of the group prenatal care experience: perceptions of women with low-risk pregnancies and their midwives.

Authors:  Sarah D McDonald; Wendy Sword; Leyla E Eryuzlu; Anne B Biringer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  The effect of antenatal education in small classes on obstetric and psycho-social outcomes - a systematic review.

Authors:  Carina Sjöberg Brixval; Solveig Forberg Axelsen; Stine Glenstrup Lauemøller; Stig Krøger Andersen; Pernille Due; Vibeke Koushede
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-28

10.  Quality of prenatal care questionnaire: instrument development and testing.

Authors:  Maureen I Heaman; Wendy A Sword; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Amanda Bradford; Suzanne Tough; Patricia A Janssen; David C Young; Dawn A Kingston; Eileen K Hutton; Michael E Helewa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  1 in total

1.  Group Pregnancy Care for refugee background women: a codesigned, multimethod evaluation protocol applying a community engagement framework and an interrupted time series design.

Authors:  Elisha Riggs; Jane Yelland; Fiona K Mensah; Lisa Gold; Josef Szwarc; Ida Kaplan; Rhonda Small; Philippa Middleton; Ann Krastev; Ellie McDonald; Christine East; Caroline Homer; Natalija Nesvadba; Laura Biggs; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Stephanie J Brown
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.