Literature DB >> 15972907

Influence of surface geometry and the cam-post mechanism on the kinematics of total knee replacement.

H Pandit1, T Ward, D Hollinghurst, D J Beard, H S Gill, N P Thomas, D W Murray.   

Abstract

Abnormal sagittal kinematics after total knee replacement (TKR) can adversely affect functional outcome. Two important determinants of knee kinematics are component geometry and the presence or absence of a posterior-stabilising mechanism (cam-post). We investigated the influence of these variables by comparing the kinematics of a TKR with a polyradial femur with a single radius design, both with and without a cam-post mechanism. We assessed 55 patients, subdivided into four groups, who had undergone a TKR one year earlier by using an established fluoroscopy protocol in order to examine their kinematics in vivo. The kinematic profile was obtained by measuring the patellar tendon angle through the functional knee flexion range (0 degrees to 90 degrees ) and the results compared with 14 normal knees. All designs of TKR had abnormal sagittal kinematics compared with the normal knee. There was a significant (p < 0.05) difference between those of the two TKRs near to full extension. The presence of the cam-post mechanism did not influence the kinematics for either TKR design. These differences suggest that surface geometry is a stronger determinant of kinematics than the presence or absence of a cam-post mechanism for these two designs. This may be because the cam-post mechanism is ineffective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15972907     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B7.15716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  22 in total

1.  Can Patellar Tendon Angle reveal sagittal kinematics in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  R Stagni; S Fantozzi; F Catani; A Leardini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  In vivo sagittal plane kinematics of the FPV patellofemoral replacement.

Authors:  A P Monk; B H van Duren; H Pandit; D Shakespeare; D W Murray; H S Gill
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [A novel knee endoprosthesis with a physiological joint shape. Part 1: Biomechanical basics and tribological studies].

Authors:  K-H Frosch; T Floerkemeier; C Abicht; P Adam; H Dathe; J Fanghänel; K M Stürmer; D Kubein-Meesenburg; H Nägerl
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Changes in knee kinematics reflect the articular geometry after arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anthony M J Bull; Oliver Kessler; Mahbub Alam; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Three-dimensional patellar tendon fibre kinematics in navigated TKA with and without patellar resurfacing.

Authors:  C Belvedere; A Ensini; M d'Amato; P Barbadoro; A Leardini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Constraints in posterior-stabilised TKA kinematics: a comparison of two generations of an implant.

Authors:  Hemant Pandit; Bernard Hendrik van Duren; M Price; S Tilley; Harinderjit Singh Gill; Neil P Thomas; David W Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  No difference in gait between posterior cruciate retention and the posterior stabilized design after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lennard G H van den Boom; Jan P K Halbertsma; Jos J A M van Raaij; Reinoud W Brouwer; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Inge van den Akker-Scheek
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Does patellofemoral geometry in TKA affect patellar position in mid-flexion?

Authors:  Mo Saffarini; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Francesca Colle; Maurilio Marcacci; David Dejour
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  [A new total knee arthroplasty with physiologically shaped surfaces. Part 2: First clinical results].

Authors:  K-H Frosch; H Nägerl; D Kubein-Meesenburg; J Buchholz; J Dörner; H Dathe; O Hellerer; C Dumont; K M Stürmer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Non-traumatic dislocation (Cam Jump) in a revision knee: a case report.

Authors:  Buchi Rajendra Babu Arumilli; Bernard Ferns; Martin Smith; Ramesh Thalava; Elmoez Obeid; Bishalahalli Muddu
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.