Literature DB >> 19182027

Minimally invasive robotic-arm-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Michael A Conditt1, Martin W Roche.   

Abstract

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is an underused procedure in orthopaedic surgery due to its level of difficulty and the unpredictability of results, which can be related to component malalignment. New robotic arm technology has been developed to assist the surgeon in accurately and reproducibly preparing the femur and the tibia for a minimally invasive bone-sparing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. This new procedure provides comprehensive three-dimensional planning of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty components, including soft-tissue balancing, followed by accurate resection of the femur and the tibia. This paper reviews this new technology.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19182027     DOI： 10.2106/JBJS.H.01372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN： 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  Tibial baseplate positioning in robotic-assisted and conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Katherine P MacCallum; Jonathan R Danoff; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-10-06

Review 2.  [New technologies (robotics, custom-made) in unicondylar knee arthroplasty-pro].

Authors:  Malin Meier; Tilman Calliess; Carsten Tibesku; Johannes Beckmann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Robotics in orthopaedic surgery: why, what and how?

Authors:  Bernardo Innocenti; Edoardo Bori
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Incidental findings detected on preoperative CT imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacements: clinical importance and the effect on the scheduled arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gary Tran; Lafi S Khalil; Allen Wrubel; Chad L Klochko; Jason J Davis; Steven B Soliman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Obesity has no effect on outcomes following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes F Plate; Marco A Augart; Thorsten M Seyler; Daniel N Bracey; Aneitra Hoggard; Michael Akbar; Riyaz H Jinnah; Gary G Poehling
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Ultrasound evaluations and guided procedures of the painful joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven B Soliman; Jason J Davis; Stephanie J Muh; Saifuddin T Vohra; Ashish Patel; Marnix T van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.128

7.  Patients are Most Interested in Which Hip Arthroplasty Approach? A 15-year Google Trends Analysis.

Authors:  M Lane Moore; Joseph C Brinkman; Jordan R Pollock; David G Deckey; Justin L Makovicka; Joshua S Bingham
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-09-21

8.  Robotic-assisted femoral osteochondroplasty is more precise than a freehand technique in a Sawbone model.

Authors:  Caroline N Park; Danyal H Nawabi; Jennifer Christopher; Michael A Conditt; Anil S Ranawat
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-17

9.  Achieving accurate ligament balancing using robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Johannes F Plate; Ali Mofidi; Sandeep Mannava; Beth P Smith; Jason E Lang; Gary G Poehling; Michael A Conditt; Riyaz H Jinnah
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-03-24

10.  A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nathan A Netravali; Feimo Shen; Youngbae Park; William L Bargar
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2013-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.