| Literature DB >> 33346868 |
Malin Meier1, Tilman Calliess2, Carsten Tibesku3, Johannes Beckmann4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty offers the advantage that partial degenerative changes can be addressed with partial prosthetic solutions, thus preserving as much of the native joint as possible, including the cruciate ligaments. On the other hand, the number of revisions is still higher than for total knee endoprosthetics. In the literature, the causes mentioned are insufficient fit of the components as well as surgical errors. The use of new technologies to achieve a better fit and higher surgical precision and reproducibility, therefore, represents a promising approach. INDIVIDUAL ENDOPROSTHETICS: Individual endoprosthetics offers the advantage that the prosthesis is adapted to the individual anatomy of each patient and not the patient's anatomy to the prosthesis, as is the case with standard prostheses. This allows for an optimal fit of the prosthesis while avoiding excessive bone resections and soft tissue releases. ROBOTICS: The use of robotics in endoprosthetics makes it easier to correctly perform bone resections and align components. This ensures high and reproducible precision even for surgeons with lower case numbers. Studies on individual unicondylar endoprosthetics and robotics are reporting promising results. However, long-term results of high-quality randomized studies must be awaited in order to make a scientifically sound statement.Entities:
Keywords: Customized; Partial knee replacement; Patient specific; Personalized medicine; Unikompartmental
Year: 2021 PMID: 33346868 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-04058-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthopade ISSN: 0085-4530 Impact factor: 1.087