Literature DB >> 33346868

[New technologies (robotics, custom-made) in unicondylar knee arthroplasty-pro].

Malin Meier1, Tilman Calliess2, Carsten Tibesku3, Johannes Beckmann4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty offers the advantage that partial degenerative changes can be addressed with partial prosthetic solutions, thus preserving as much of the native joint as possible, including the cruciate ligaments. On the other hand, the number of revisions is still higher than for total knee endoprosthetics. In the literature, the causes mentioned are insufficient fit of the components as well as surgical errors. The use of new technologies to achieve a better fit and higher surgical precision and reproducibility, therefore, represents a promising approach. INDIVIDUAL ENDOPROSTHETICS: Individual endoprosthetics offers the advantage that the prosthesis is adapted to the individual anatomy of each patient and not the patient's anatomy to the prosthesis, as is the case with standard prostheses. This allows for an optimal fit of the prosthesis while avoiding excessive bone resections and soft tissue releases. ROBOTICS: The use of robotics in endoprosthetics makes it easier to correctly perform bone resections and align components. This ensures high and reproducible precision even for surgeons with lower case numbers. Studies on individual unicondylar endoprosthetics and robotics are reporting promising results. However, long-term results of high-quality randomized studies must be awaited in order to make a scientifically sound statement.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Customized; Partial knee replacement; Patient specific; Personalized medicine; Unikompartmental

Year:  2021        PMID: 33346868     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-020-04058-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  47 in total

1.  Tibial plateau coverage in UKA: a comparison of patient specific and off-the-shelf implants.

Authors:  Dylan P Carpenter; Rebecca R Holmberg; Marc J Quartulli; C Lowry Barnes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Simon Jameson; Rebecca Critchley; Mike Reed; Paul Gregg; David Deehan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Improved Accuracy of Component Positioning with Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Data from a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Stuart W Bell; Iain Anthony; Bryn Jones; Angus MacLean; Philip Rowe; Mark Blyth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Customised bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty shows encouraging 3-year results: findings of a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  J Beckmann; A F Steinert; B Huber; M Rudert; F X Köck; M Buhs; L Rolston
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value.

Authors:  R L Barrack; E L Ruh; B M Williams; A D Ford; K Foreman; R M Nunley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-11

6.  Mid-term survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of robotic-arm assisted partial knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Joost A Burger; Laura J Kleeblad; Niels Laas; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  ACL status in arthroplasty patients, why not to preserve?

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelbadie; Ahmed Ali Toreih; Mohamed Ahmed Radwan
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2018-01-05

8.  Robotic arm-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Exploratory secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M J G Blyth; I Anthony; P Rowe; M S Banger; A MacLean; B Jones
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.853

9.  The impact of patient-specific instrumentation on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Abtin Alvand; Tanvir Khan; Cathy Jenkins; Jonathan L Rees; William F Jackson; Christopher A F Dodd; David W Murray; Andrew J Price
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Mediolateral oversizing influences pain, function, and flexion after TKA.

Authors:  Michel P Bonnin; Axel Schmidt; Luca Basiglini; Nadine Bossard; Emmanuelle Dantony
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.