Bernardo Innocenti1, Edoardo Bori2. 1. BEAMS Department, Bio Electro and Mechanical Systems, École Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. Roosevelt, 50 CP165/56, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium. bernardo.innocenti@ulb.be. 2. BEAMS Department, Bio Electro and Mechanical Systems, École Polytechnique de Bruxelles, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Av. F. Roosevelt, 50 CP165/56, 1050, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Robotics applied to orthopedics has become an interesting topic both from the surgical point of view and the engineering one. The main goal of those systems is the enhancement of joint arthroplasty surgery, providing the robotic support to precisely and accurately prepare the bone, restore the limb alignment and the physiological kinematics of the joint. Various robotic systems are currently available on the market, each addressing specific kind of surgeries and characterized by a series of specific features that may involve different requirements and/or modus operandi. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An overview of these devices was performed, addressing the different categories in which robots are subdivided in terms of: operations performed, requirements and level of interaction of the surgeon. The main models currently available on the market were addressed and relative studies in the literature were reported and compared, to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of the different technologies. RESULTS: The different robotic systems were subdivided in: open/closed platform, image-based/imageless and active/passive/semi-active. Regardless of the typology of robotic system, the main aim is to improve precision and accuracy of the operation. It is to be noted that, regardless of the typology of robotic system, the surgeon is still in charge of the planning and approval of the operation: only the precise and consistent execution of his directives is entrusted to the robot. The positive factors have however to be weighed against the fact that robotic systems involve an important initial investment and most of the times require the surgeons and the staff to learn how to operate them (with a learning curve differing from system to system). CONCLUSIONS: Each surgeon, when considering if and which robotic system to adopt, has to properly evaluate the different benefits and drawbacks involved to find the surgical robot that fits his needs the best.
INTRODUCTION: Robotics applied to orthopedics has become an interesting topic both from the surgical point of view and the engineering one. The main goal of those systems is the enhancement of joint arthroplasty surgery, providing the robotic support to precisely and accurately prepare the bone, restore the limb alignment and the physiological kinematics of the joint. Various robotic systems are currently available on the market, each addressing specific kind of surgeries and characterized by a series of specific features that may involve different requirements and/or modus operandi. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An overview of these devices was performed, addressing the different categories in which robots are subdivided in terms of: operations performed, requirements and level of interaction of the surgeon. The main models currently available on the market were addressed and relative studies in the literature were reported and compared, to highlight the benefits and drawbacks of the different technologies. RESULTS: The different robotic systems were subdivided in: open/closed platform, image-based/imageless and active/passive/semi-active. Regardless of the typology of robotic system, the main aim is to improve precision and accuracy of the operation. It is to be noted that, regardless of the typology of robotic system, the surgeon is still in charge of the planning and approval of the operation: only the precise and consistent execution of his directives is entrusted to the robot. The positive factors have however to be weighed against the fact that robotic systems involve an important initial investment and most of the times require the surgeons and the staff to learn how to operate them (with a learning curve differing from system to system). CONCLUSIONS: Each surgeon, when considering if and which robotic system to adopt, has to properly evaluate the different benefits and drawbacks involved to find the surgical robot that fits his needs the best.
Authors: Samik Banerjee; Jeffrey J Cherian; Randa K Elmallah; Julio J Jauregui; Todd P Pierce; Michael A Mont Journal: Expert Rev Med Devices Date: 2015-09-12 Impact factor: 3.166
Authors: Samik Banerjee; Jeffery J Cherian; Randa K Elmallah; Todd P Pierce; Julio J Jauregui; Michael A Mont Journal: Expert Rev Med Devices Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 3.166
Authors: Paul L Sousa; Peter K Sculco; David J Mayman; Seth A Jerabek; Michael P Ast; Brian P Chalmers Journal: Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med Date: 2020-06
Authors: Merrill A Ritter; Kenneth E Davis; John B Meding; Jeffery L Pierson; Michael E Berend; Robert A Malinzak Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Stephen G Zak; David Cieremans; Alex Tang; Ran Schwarzkopf; Joshua C Rozell Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2022-05-12 Impact factor: 3.067