Literature DB >> 19171141

A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy.

María Elena Martínez1, John A Baron, David A Lieberman, Arthur Schatzkin, Elaine Lanza, Sidney J Winawer, Ann G Zauber, Ruiyun Jiang, Dennis J Ahnen, John H Bond, Timothy R Church, Douglas J Robertson, Stephanie A Smith-Warner, Elizabeth T Jacobs, David S Alberts, E Robert Greenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Limited data exist regarding the actual risk of developing advanced adenomas and cancer after polypectomy or the factors that determine risk.
METHODS: We pooled individual data from 8 prospective studies comprising 9167 men and women aged 22 to 80 with previously resected colorectal adenomas to quantify their risk of developing subsequent advanced adenoma or cancer as well as identify factors associated with the development of advanced colorectal neoplasms during surveillance.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up period of 47.2 months, advanced colorectal neoplasia was diagnosed in 1082 (11.8%) of the patients, 58 of whom (0.6%) had invasive cancer. Risk of a metachronous advanced adenoma was higher among patients with 5 or more baseline adenomas (24.1%; standard error, 2.2) and those with an adenoma 20 mm in size or greater (19.3%; standard error, 1.5). Risk factor patterns were similar for advanced adenomas and invasive cancer. In multivariate analyses, older age (P < .0001 for trend) and male sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.65) were associated significantly with an increased risk for metachronous advanced neoplasia, as were the number and size of prior adenomas (P < .0001 for trend), the presence of villous features (OR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.07-1.52), and proximal location (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.43-1.98). High-grade dysplasia was not associated independently with metachronous advanced neoplasia after adjustment for other adenoma characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: Occurrence of advanced colorectal neoplasia is common after polypectomy. Factors that are associated most strongly with risk of advanced neoplasia are patient age and the number and size of prior adenomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19171141      PMCID: PMC3685417          DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  39 in total

1.  Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients.

Authors:  Lucio Bertario; Antonio Russo; Paola Sala; Paolo Pizzetti; Giovanni Ballardini; Salvatore Andreola; Pasquale Spinelli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 7.396

2.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials.

Authors:  R DerSimonian; N Laird
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1986-09

3.  Logistic regression with incompletely observed categorical covariates--investigating the sensitivity against violation of the missing at random assumption.

Authors:  W Vach; M Blettner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1995-06-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy.

Authors:  Pauline A Mysliwiec; Martin L Brown; Carrie N Klabunde; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-08-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Colorectal adenoma characteristics as predictors of recurrence.

Authors:  C Bonithon-Kopp; F Piard; C Fenger; E Cabeza; C O'Morain; O Kronborg; J Faivre
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas.

Authors:  W S Atkin; B C Morson; J Cuzick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-03-05       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Colorectal cancer risk in adenoma patients: a nation-wide study.

Authors:  F Loeve; M van Ballegooijen; R Boer; E J Kuipers; J D F Habbema
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M J O'Brien; M N Ho; L Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; J Bond; M Schapiro; E T Stewart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A clinical trial of antioxidant vitamins to prevent colorectal adenoma. Polyp Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  E R Greenberg; J A Baron; T D Tosteson; D H Freeman; G J Beck; J H Bond; T A Colacchio; J A Coller; H D Frankl; R W Haile
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  160 in total

1.  The first year follow-up after colorectal adenoma polypectomy is important: a multiple-center study in symptomatic hospital-based individuals in China.

Authors:  Qin-Yan Gao; Hui-Min Chen; Jian-Qiu Sheng; Ping Zheng; Cheng-Gong Yu; Bo Jiang; Jing-Yuan Fang
Journal:  Front Med China       Date:  2010-12-02

2.  GRG Profiles: David A. Lieberman.

Authors:  David A Lieberman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance Colonoscopy in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jennifer K Maratt; Audrey H Calderwood
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

4.  Probability of high-risk colorectal neoplasm recurrence based on the results of two previous colonoscopies.

Authors:  Hye Won Park; Seungbong Han; Ji Young Lee; Hye-Sook Chang; Jaewon Choe; Yunsik Choi; Hoonsub So; Dong-Hoon Yang; Seung-Jae Myung; Suk-Kyun Yang; Jin-Ho Kim; Jeong-Sik Byeon
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.

Authors:  Yinglong Huang; Wei Gong; Bingzhong Su; Fachao Zhi; Side Liu; Yang Bai; Bo Jiang
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Repeat colonoscopy after a colonoscopy with a negative result in Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Lieke Hol; Rinku Sutradhar; Sumei Gu; Nancy N Baxter; Linda Rabeneck; Jill M Tinmouth; Lawrence F Paszat
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

7.  The association of age and race and the risk of large bowel polyps.

Authors:  Kristin Wallace; Carol A Burke; Dennis J Ahnen; Elizabeth L Barry; Robert S Bresalier; Fred Saibil; John A Baron
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Multiple Diminutive Adenomas.

Authors:  Jung Yoon Kim; Tae Jun Kim; Sun-Young Baek; Soohyun Ahn; Eun Ran Kim; Sung Noh Hong; Dong Kyung Chang; Young-Ho Kim
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Thinking Big About Small Adenomas: Moving Toward "Precision Surveillance".

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Monoclonal antibodies that target the immunogenic proteins expressed in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Myron Arlen; Philip Arlen; Gene Coppa; Jim Crawford; XuePing Wang; Olga Saric; Alex Dubeykovskiy; Ernesto Molmenti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.