Literature DB >> 30072776

Risk of Metachronous Advanced Neoplasia in Patients With Multiple Diminutive Adenomas.

Jung Yoon Kim1, Tae Jun Kim1, Sun-Young Baek1, Soohyun Ahn1, Eun Ran Kim1, Sung Noh Hong1, Dong Kyung Chang1, Young-Ho Kim1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Individuals with advanced adenomas or three or more adenomas have a higher risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia (AN) and are recommended to undergo surveillance colonoscopy at shorter intervals. However, it is questionable whether patients with multiple (three or more) non-advanced diminutive adenomas should be considered as high-risk.
METHODS: We analyzed 5482 patients diagnosed with one or more adenomas during their first colonoscopy screening and who underwent a follow-up colonoscopy. Patients were categorized into four groups based on adenoma characteristics at baseline: Group 1, 1-2 non-advanced adenomas; Group 2, ≥3 non-advanced, diminutive (1 to 5 mm) adenomas; Group 3, ≥3 non-advanced, small (6-9 mm) adenomas; and Group 4, advanced adenomas.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 38 months, the incidence of metachronous AN at surveillance colonoscopy was 5.6%. The incidence of AN was 3.9% in group 1, 5.9% in group 2, 10.6% in group 3, and 22.1% in group 4. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) [95% confidence intervals (CIs)] for metachronous AN between group 2, group 3, and group 4, and low risk group 1 were 1.71 (0.99-2.94), 2.76 (1.72-4.44), and 5.23 (3.57-7.68), respectively. Compared with group 4, the adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for group 1, group 2, and group 3 were 0.19 (0.13-0.28), 0.32 (0.18-0.59), and 0.52 (0.31-0.89), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients with three or more non-advanced diminutive adenomas had a borderline increased risk of metachronous AN compared with patients with low risk adenomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30072776      PMCID: PMC6768622          DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0210-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  26 in total

1.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  F Citarda; G Tomaselli; R Capocaccia; S Barcherini; M Crespi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans.

Authors:  Su Jin Chung; Young Sun Kim; Sun Young Yang; Ji Hyun Song; Donghee Kim; Min Jung Park; Sang Gyun Kim; In Sung Song; Joo Sung Kim
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Predictors of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in sporadic adenoma patients.

Authors:  Lucio Bertario; Antonio Russo; Paola Sala; Paolo Pizzetti; Giovanni Ballardini; Salvatore Andreola; Pasquale Spinelli
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-05-20       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Elizabeth Ward; Betsy A Kohler; Christie Eheman; Ann G Zauber; Robert N Anderson; Ahmedin Jemal; Maria J Schymura; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Laura C Seeff; Marjolein van Ballegooijen; S Luuk Goede; Lynn A G Ries
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Authors:  Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Robert H Fletcher; Jonathon S Stillman; Michael J O'Brien; Bernard Levin; Robert A Smith; David A Lieberman; Randall W Burt; Theodore R Levin; John H Bond; Durado Brooks; Tim Byers; Neil Hyman; Lynne Kirk; Alan Thorson; Clifford Simmang; David Johnson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer risk after colonoscopic polypectomy: a population-based study and literature search.

Authors:  F Loeve; M van Ballegooijen; P Snel; J D F Habbema
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  María Elena Martínez; John A Baron; David A Lieberman; Arthur Schatzkin; Elaine Lanza; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Ruiyun Jiang; Dennis J Ahnen; John H Bond; Timothy R Church; Douglas J Robertson; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Elizabeth T Jacobs; David S Alberts; E Robert Greenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Estimation of impact of American College of Radiology recommendations on CT colonography reporting for resection of high-risk adenoma findings.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Andrew J Overhiser; Shawn C Chen; Oscar W Cummings; Thomas M Ulbright
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale; Elizabeth A Glowinski; Ching Lin-Cooper; Gregory N Larkin; James D Rogge; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Yield of a second screening colonoscopy 10 years after an initial negative examination in average-risk individuals.

Authors:  Prasanna L Ponugoti; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 9.427

View more
  5 in total

1.  Does Colon Polyp Surveillance Improve Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  David Lieberman; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Update in Surveillance Recommendations in Individuals With Conventional Adenomas.

Authors:  Rishabh Sachdev; Rahul Sao; John W Birk; Joseph C Anderson; Joel Levine
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06

3.  Does computer-aided diagnostic endoscopy improve the detection of commonly missed polyps? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arun Sivananthan; Scarlet Nazarian; Lakshmana Ayaru; Kinesh Patel; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Nisha Patel
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-05-12

4.  Thinking Big About Small Adenomas: Moving Toward "Precision Surveillance".

Authors:  Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Higher Adenoma Detection Rates at Screening Associated With Lower Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality.

Authors:  Amanda J Cross; Emma C Robbins; Brian P Saunders; Stephen W Duffy; Kate Wooldrage
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 11.382

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.