Literature DB >> 19165686

Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation.

Katherine A Raichle1, Marisol A Hanley, Ivan Molton, Nancy J Kadel, Kellye Campbell, Emily Phelps, Dawn Ehde, Douglas G Smith.   

Abstract

This study identified clinical (e.g., etiology) and demographic factors related to prosthesis use in persons with upper- and lower-limb amputation (ULA and LLA, respectively) and the effect of phantom limb pain (PLP) and residual limb pain (RLP) on prosthesis use. A total of 752 respondents with LLA and 107 respondents with ULA completed surveys. Factors related to greater use (hours per day) for persons with LLA included younger age, full- or part-time employment, marriage, a distal amputation, an amputation of traumatic etiology, and an absence of PLP. Less use was associated with reports that prosthesis use worsened RLP, and greater prosthesis use was associated with reports that prosthesis use did not affect PLP. Having a proximal amputation and reporting lower average PLP were related to greater use in hours per day for persons with an ULA, while having a distal amputation and being married were associated with greater use in days per month. Finally, participants with LLA were significantly more likely to wear a prosthesis than those with ULA. These results underscore the importance of examining factors related to prosthesis use and the differential effect that these variables may have when the etiology and location of amputation are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19165686      PMCID: PMC2743731          DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2007.09.0151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev        ISSN: 0748-7711


  22 in total

1.  A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities.

Authors:  Judith Davidson
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Prosthetic use and functional and social outcome following major lower limb amputation.

Authors:  T Pohjolainen; H Alaranta; M Kärkkäinen
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Factors related to successful upper extremity prosthetic use.

Authors:  R A Roeschlein; E Domholdt
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  A review of employment patterns of industrial amputees--factors influencing rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Millstein; D Bain; G A Hunter
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Return to work following limb injuries.

Authors:  K Sheikh
Journal:  J Soc Occup Med       Date:  1985

6.  Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees.

Authors:  I Dudkiewicz; R Gabrielov; I Seiv-Ner; G Zelig; M Heim
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Prosthetic use in elderly patients with dysvascular above-knee and through-knee amputations.

Authors:  C E Beekman; L A Axtell
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1987-10

8.  Use and satisfaction with prosthetic limb devices and related services.

Authors:  Liliana E Pezzin; Timothy R Dillingham; Ellen J Mackenzie; Patti Ephraim; Paddy Rossbach
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States.

Authors:  Timothy R Dillingham; Liliana E Pezzin; Ellen J MacKenzie
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Physical, mental, and social predictors of functional outcome in unilateral lower-limb amputees.

Authors:  Tanneke Schoppen; Annemarijke Boonstra; Johan W Groothoff; Jaap de Vries; Ludwig N Göeken; Willem H Eisma
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 3.966

View more
  45 in total

1.  Fall Prevalence and Contributors to the Likelihood of Falling in Persons With Upper Limb Loss.

Authors:  Matthew J Major
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04-01

2.  Prosthetic Jamming Terminal Device: A Case Study of Untethered Soft Robotics.

Authors:  Nadia Cheng; John Amend; Todd Farrell; Debra Latour; Carlos Martinez; Jen Johansson; Anthony McNicoll; Marek Wartenberg; Samuel Naseef; William Hanson; William Culley
Journal:  Soft Robot       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 8.071

3.  COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF AN ADJUSTABLE TRANSFEMORAL PROSTHETIC INTERFACE ACCOMMODATING VOLUME FLUCTUATION: CASE STUDY.

Authors:  Jason T Kahle; Tyler D Klenow; M Jason Highsmith
Journal:  Technol Innov       Date:  2016-09

4.  Stable, Robust Hybrid Zero Dynamics Control of Powered Lower-Limb Prostheses.

Authors:  Anne E Martin; Robert D Gregg
Journal:  IEEE Trans Automat Contr       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 5.792

5.  Predicting successful prosthetic rehabilitation in major lower-limb amputation patients: a 15-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Inés Fajardo-Martos; Olga Roda; Ramón Zambudio-Periago; Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas; Fidel Hita-Contreras; Indalecio Sánchez-Montesinos
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 6.  Factors Influencing Functional Outcomes and Return-to-Work After Amputation: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Benjamin J Darter; Carolyn E Hawley; Amy J Armstrong; Lauren Avellone; Paul Wehman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2018-12

7.  [Capsaicin 8 % cutaneous patches for phantom limb pain. Results from everyday practice (non-interventional study)].

Authors:  K-U Kern; H Baust; W Hofmann; R Holzmüller; C Maihöfner; M-L Heskamp
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 8.  Considerations for development of sensing and monitoring tools to facilitate treatment and care of persons with lower-limb loss: a review.

Authors:  Brian J Hafner; Joan E Sanders
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

Review 9.  Composite Tissue Transplant of Hand or Arm: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-06-01

10.  Amputation as an Unusual Treatment for Therapy-Resistant Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Type 1.

Authors:  Babak K Kashy; Alaa A Abd-Elsayed; Ehab Farag; Maria Yared; Roya Vakili; Wael Ali Sakr Esa
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.