Literature DB >> 28078196

Prosthetic Jamming Terminal Device: A Case Study of Untethered Soft Robotics.

Nadia Cheng1, John Amend1, Todd Farrell2, Debra Latour3, Carlos Martinez2, Jen Johansson2, Anthony McNicoll1, Marek Wartenberg2, Samuel Naseef1, William Hanson2, William Culley1.   

Abstract

This article illuminates the major and often overlooked challenge of untethering soft robotic systems through the context of recent work, in which soft robotic gripper technology enabled by jamming of granular media was applied to a prosthetic jamming terminal device (PJTD). The PJTD's technical and market feasibility was evaluated in a pilot study with two upper-limb amputees. A PJTD prototype was tested against a commercial device (Motion Control electric terminal service with a one degree-of-freedom pinching mechanism) using two existing hand function tests: the first quantified the device's speed in picking and placing small blocks and the second evaluated a person's ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). The PJTD prototype performed slightly slower than its commercial counterpart in the first test. While both participants successfully completed all the ADLs with both devices in the second test, the commercial device scored marginally higher. Results suggested that PJTD can have potential benefits over existing terminal devices, such as providing the capability to firmly grasp tools due to the ability of PJTD to conform to arbitrary surfaces and reducing compensatory shoulder movements due to its axisymmetric design. Some downsides were that users reported fatigue while operating the PJTD, as most operations require pushing the PJTD against target objects to adequately conform to them. The greatest drawback for the PJTD is also a major roadblock preventing a number of soft robotic research projects from making an impact in real-world applications: pneumatic technology required for operating the PJTD is currently too large and heavy to enable compact untethered operation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amputee; gripper; hand; myoelectric; prosthetic; soft; upper-limb

Year:  2016        PMID: 28078196      PMCID: PMC5180076          DOI: 10.1089/soro.2016.0017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soft Robot        ISSN: 2169-5172            Impact factor:   8.071


  10 in total

1.  A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities.

Authors:  Judith Davidson
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2002 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  Multigait soft robot.

Authors:  Robert F Shepherd; Filip Ilievski; Wonjae Choi; Stephen A Morin; Adam A Stokes; Aaron D Mazzeo; Xin Chen; Michael Wang; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Prosthetic usage in major upper extremity amputations.

Authors:  T W Wright; A D Hagen; M B Wood
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 4.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots.

Authors:  Daniela Rus; Michael T Tolley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Normative data for modified Box and Blocks test measuring upper-limb function via motion capture.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Hebert; Justin Lewicke; Thomas R Williams; Albert H Vette
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2014

Review 6.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics.

Authors:  Sangbae Kim; Cecilia Laschi; Barry Trimmer
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 19.536

7.  A review of employment patterns of industrial amputees--factors influencing rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Millstein; D Bain; G A Hunter
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050.

Authors:  Kathryn Ziegler-Graham; Ellen J MacKenzie; Patti L Ephraim; Thomas G Travison; Ron Brookmeyer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  Prosthesis use in persons with lower- and upper-limb amputation.

Authors:  Katherine A Raichle; Marisol A Hanley; Ivan Molton; Nancy J Kadel; Kellye Campbell; Emily Phelps; Dawn Ehde; Douglas G Smith
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  2008

10.  Limb amputation and limb deficiency: epidemiology and recent trends in the United States.

Authors:  Timothy R Dillingham; Liliana E Pezzin; Ellen J MacKenzie
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 0.954

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Customization Methodology for Conformable Grasping Posture of Soft Grippers by Stiffness Patterning.

Authors:  Jun-Young Lee; Jaemin Eom; Sung Yol Yu; Kyujin Cho
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2020-09-18

2.  Comparison between rigid and soft poly-articulated prosthetic hands in non-expert myo-electric users shows advantages of soft robotics.

Authors:  Patricia Capsi-Morales; Cristina Piazza; Manuel G Catalano; Giorgio Grioli; Lisa Schiavon; Elena Fiaschi; Antonio Bicchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.