OBJECTIVE: To study the value of physical, mental, and social characteristics as predictors of functional outcome of elderly amputees. DESIGN: Prospective, inception cohort study; comparisons with reference populations. SETTING: Main hospitals, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, patients' own residence settings in 1 of the 3 northern provinces in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six patients older than 60 years, with unilateral transtibial or transfemoral amputation or knee disarticulation because of vascular disease. INTERVENTIONS: Measurement of physical, mental, and social predictors 2 and 6 weeks postamputation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP-68), Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS), Timed up and go (TUG) test, and prosthetic use. RESULTS: A total of 15% of amputees died within the first year after amputation. Seventy percent lived independently at home 1 year postamputation. The functional level of the patients was low, as shown by high scores on the SIP-68 (mean, 23.6), GARS (mean, 41.2), and TUG test (mean, 23.9s). Functionally effective prosthetic use, as measured with the classification of Narang and Pohjolainen, was reached by 49%. For the SIP-68 scores, age, comorbidity, 1-leg balance, and the 15-word test predicted functional outcome in 69% of amputees. For the GARS score, age, 1-leg balance, and the 15-word test predicted functional outcome in 64%. For the TUG test, age and 1-leg balance predicted functional outcome in 42% of amputees. After correction for age, the only significant predictor for prosthetic use was 1-leg balance. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with a leg amputation had a low functional level 1-year postamputation. An important part of functional outcome could be predicted 2 weeks after amputation by age at amputation, 1-leg balance on the unaffected limb, and cognitive impairment. Severe comorbidity probably also played a role. The results may be used in the general policy concerning leg amputees.
OBJECTIVE: To study the value of physical, mental, and social characteristics as predictors of functional outcome of elderly amputees. DESIGN: Prospective, inception cohort study; comparisons with reference populations. SETTING: Main hospitals, rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, patients' own residence settings in 1 of the 3 northern provinces in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-six patients older than 60 years, with unilateral transtibial or transfemoral amputation or knee disarticulation because of vascular disease. INTERVENTIONS: Measurement of physical, mental, and social predictors 2 and 6 weeks postamputation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP-68), Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS), Timed up and go (TUG) test, and prosthetic use. RESULTS: A total of 15% of amputees died within the first year after amputation. Seventy percent lived independently at home 1 year postamputation. The functional level of the patients was low, as shown by high scores on the SIP-68 (mean, 23.6), GARS (mean, 41.2), and TUG test (mean, 23.9s). Functionally effective prosthetic use, as measured with the classification of Narang and Pohjolainen, was reached by 49%. For the SIP-68 scores, age, comorbidity, 1-leg balance, and the 15-word test predicted functional outcome in 69% of amputees. For the GARS score, age, 1-leg balance, and the 15-word test predicted functional outcome in 64%. For the TUG test, age and 1-leg balance predicted functional outcome in 42% of amputees. After correction for age, the only significant predictor for prosthetic use was 1-leg balance. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with a leg amputation had a low functional level 1-year postamputation. An important part of functional outcome could be predicted 2 weeks after amputation by age at amputation, 1-leg balance on the unaffected limb, and cognitive impairment. Severe comorbidity probably also played a role. The results may be used in the general policy concerning leg amputees.
Authors: Bjoern D Suckow; Philip P Goodney; Brian W Nolan; Ravi K Veeraswamy; Patricia Gallagher; Jack L Cronenwett; Larry W Kraiss Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Cory L Christiansen; Thomas Fields; Guy Lev; Ryan O Stephenson; Jennifer E Stevens-Lapsley Journal: PM R Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Alexander T Hawkins; Anthony J Pallangyo; Ayesiga M Herman; Maria J Schaumeier; Ann D Smith; Nathanael D Hevelone; David M Crandell; Louis L Nguyen Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Monica Spruit-van Eijk; Bianca I Buijck; Sytse U Zuidema; Frans L M Voncken; Alexander C H Geurts; Raymond T C M Koopmans Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-03-27 Impact factor: 3.921