Inés Fajardo-Martos1, Olga Roda2, Ramón Zambudio-Periago1, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas3, Fidel Hita-Contreras4, Indalecio Sánchez-Montesinos2. 1. Service of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Prosthetics and Orthotics Unit, University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain. 2. Department of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. 3. Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain. 4. Department of Health Sciences, Human Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain. Electronic address: fhita@ujaen.es.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare specific factors that could be associated and predictive with successful prosthetic rehabilitation in major lower-limb amputations. METHODS: A 15-year long (2000-2014) retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. Two different criteria were used to define successful prosthetic rehabilitation: (1) the ability to walk at least 45m, regardless of assistive devices; and (2) walking >45m without other ambulatory aids than one cane (if required). Age, gender, comorbidities, cause and level of amputation, stump characteristics, ulcers in the preserved limb, and time between surgery and physical therapy were examined as predictors of successful prosthetic rehabilitation. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients (61.60±15.9 years) were included. Regarding walking ability with or without walking aids, the presence of ulcers in the preserved limb was individually associated with failed prosthetic rehabilitation (p<0.001), while being male (OR=0.21; 95%CI=0.06-0.80) and transtibial level of amputation (OR=6.73; 95%CI=1.92-23.64) were identified as independent predictors of failure and success, respectively. Regarding the criterion of successful rehabilitation, a shorter time until rehabilitation was individually associated with improved walking ability (p<0.013), while failure could be predicted by comorbidities (OR=0.48; 95%CI=0.29-0.78) and age groups of 65-75 years old (OR=0.19; 95%CI=0.05-0.78) and over 75 years old (OR=0.19; 95%CI=0.04-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding walking ability with or without walking aids, male gender and transtibial level of amputation are independently associated with failure and success respectively, whereas older age and comorbidities can predict failed prosthetic rehabilitation when assistive walking devices are considered. Future prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings.
OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare specific factors that could be associated and predictive with successful prosthetic rehabilitation in major lower-limb amputations. METHODS: A 15-year long (2000-2014) retrospective observational cohort study was conducted. Two different criteria were used to define successful prosthetic rehabilitation: (1) the ability to walk at least 45m, regardless of assistive devices; and (2) walking >45m without other ambulatory aids than one cane (if required). Age, gender, comorbidities, cause and level of amputation, stump characteristics, ulcers in the preserved limb, and time between surgery and physical therapy were examined as predictors of successful prosthetic rehabilitation. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients (61.60±15.9 years) were included. Regarding walking ability with or without walking aids, the presence of ulcers in the preserved limb was individually associated with failed prosthetic rehabilitation (p<0.001), while being male (OR=0.21; 95%CI=0.06-0.80) and transtibial level of amputation (OR=6.73; 95%CI=1.92-23.64) were identified as independent predictors of failure and success, respectively. Regarding the criterion of successful rehabilitation, a shorter time until rehabilitation was individually associated with improved walking ability (p<0.013), while failure could be predicted by comorbidities (OR=0.48; 95%CI=0.29-0.78) and age groups of 65-75 years old (OR=0.19; 95%CI=0.05-0.78) and over 75 years old (OR=0.19; 95%CI=0.04-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Regarding walking ability with or without walking aids, male gender and transtibial level of amputation are independently associated with failure and success respectively, whereas older age and comorbidities can predict failed prosthetic rehabilitation when assistive walking devices are considered. Future prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Authors: D D Fletcher; K L Andrews; M A Butters; S J Jacobsen; C M Rowland; J W Hallett Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Alice C Scheffer; Marieke J Schuurmans; Nynke van Dijk; Truus van der Hooft; Sophia E de Rooij Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Ellen J MacKenzie; Michael J Bosse; Renan C Castillo; Douglas G Smith; Lawrence X Webb; James F Kellam; Andrew R Burgess; Marc F Swiontkowski; Roy W Sanders; Alan L Jones; Mark P McAndrew; Brendan M Patterson; Thomas G Travison; Melissa L McCarthy Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: José Vicente Benavent; José María Tenías; Ana Pellin; Jorge Casaña Mohedo; Ana Cristina Cabellos-García; Vicente Gea-Caballero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 3.390