Literature DB >> 19162131

The cerebellum and eye-blink conditioning: learning versus network performance hypotheses.

V Bracha1, S Zbarska, K Parker, A Carrel, G Zenitsky, J R Bloedel.   

Abstract

Classical conditioning of the eye-blink reflex in the rabbit is a form of motor learning that is uniquely dependent on the cerebellum. The cerebellar learning hypothesis proposes that plasticity subserving eye-blink conditioning occurs in the cerebellum. The major evidence for this hypothesis originated from studies based on a telecommunications network metaphor of eye-blink circuits. These experiments inactivated parts of cerebellum-related networks during the acquisition and expression of classically conditioned eye blinks in order to determine sites at which the plasticity occurred. However, recent evidence revealed that these manipulations could be explained by a network performance hypothesis which attributes learning deficits to a non-specific tonic dysfunction of eye-blink networks. Since eye-blink conditioning is mediated by a spontaneously active, recurrent neuronal network with strong tonic interactions, differentiating between the cerebellar learning hypothesis and the network performance hypothesis represents a major experimental challenge. A possible solution to this problem is offered by several promising new approaches that minimize the effects of experimental interventions on spontaneous neuronal activity. Results from these studies indicate that plastic changes underlying eye-blink conditioning are distributed across several cerebellar and extra-cerebellar regions. Specific input interactions that induce these plastic changes as well as their cellular mechanisms remain unresolved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19162131      PMCID: PMC2822538          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.12.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  46 in total

1.  GABA neurotransmission in the cerebellar interposed nuclei: involvement in classically conditioned eyeblinks and neuronal activity.

Authors:  D Aksenov; N Serdyukova; K Irwin; V Bracha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Cerebellar inhibition of inferior olivary transmission in the decerebrate ferret.

Authors:  P Svensson; F Bengtsson; G Hesslow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Inferior olivary inactivation abolishes conditioned eyeblinks: extinction or cerebellar malfunction?

Authors:  S Zbarska; E A Holland; J R Bloedel; V Bracha
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-17       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Inhibitory cerebello-olivary projections and blocking effect in classical conditioning.

Authors:  J J Kim; D J Krupa; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Inactivation of cerebellar output axons impairs acquisition of conditioned eyeblinks.

Authors:  W U Nilaweera; G D Zenitsky; V Bracha
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Bilateral cerebellar lesions disrupt conditioned eyelid responses in unrestrained rats.

Authors:  R W Skelton
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  D J Krupa; J K Thompson; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Classically conditioned withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients. 1. Impaired conditioned responses.

Authors:  D Timmann; P C Baier; H C Diener; F P Kolb
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Long term modification of cerebellar inhibition after inferior olive degeneration.

Authors:  C Batini; J M Billard; H Daniel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

Authors:  Mario Manto; James M Bower; Adriana Bastos Conforto; José M Delgado-García; Suzete Nascimento Farias da Guarda; Marcus Gerwig; Christophe Habas; Nobuhiro Hagura; Richard B Ivry; Peter Mariën; Marco Molinari; Eiichi Naito; Dennis A Nowak; Nordeyn Oulad Ben Taib; Denis Pelisson; Claudia D Tesche; Caroline Tilikete; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  A trigeminal conditioned stimulus yields fast acquisition of cerebellum-dependent conditioned eyeblinks.

Authors:  Andrew J Carrel; Svitlana Zbarska; Gary D Zenitsky; Vlastislav Bracha
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Temporal patterns of inputs to cerebellum necessary and sufficient for trace eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tatsuya Ohyama; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Dynamic changes in the cerebellar-interpositus/red-nucleus-motoneuron pathway during motor learning.

Authors:  Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Agnès Gruart; José M Delgado-García
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Dynamic associations in the cerebellar-motoneuron network during motor learning.

Authors:  Raudel Sánchez-Campusano; Agnès Gruart; José M Delgado-García
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cerebellar cortex contributions to the expression and timing of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Tobin Davis; Tatsuya Ohyama; Frank Riusech; William L Nores; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Consensus paper: current views on the role of cerebellar interpositus nucleus in movement control and emotion.

Authors:  Vincenzo Perciavalle; Richard Apps; Vlastislav Bracha; José M Delgado-García; Alan R Gibson; Maria Leggio; Andrew J Carrel; Nadia Cerminara; Marinella Coco; Agnès Gruart; Raudel Sánchez-Campusano
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Blocking GABAA neurotransmission in the interposed nuclei: effects on conditioned and unconditioned eyeblinks.

Authors:  Krystal L Parker; Svitlana Zbarska; Andrew J Carrel; Vlastislav Bracha
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Comparison of the classically conditioned withdrawal reflex in cerebellar patients and healthy control subjects during stance: I. electrophysiological characteristics.

Authors:  D Timmann; T Kaulich; W Föhre; D F Kutz; M Gerwig; F P Kolb
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Blocking glutamate-mediated inferior olivary signals abolishes expression of conditioned eyeblinks but does not prevent their acquisition.

Authors:  Andrew J Carrel; Gary D Zenitsky; Vlastislav Bracha
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.