Literature DB >> 21933685

A trigeminal conditioned stimulus yields fast acquisition of cerebellum-dependent conditioned eyeblinks.

Andrew J Carrel1, Svitlana Zbarska, Gary D Zenitsky, Vlastislav Bracha.   

Abstract

Classical conditioning of the eyeblink response in the rabbit is a form of motor learning whereby the animal learns to respond to an initially irrelevant conditioned stimulus (CS). It is thought that acquired conditioned responses (CRs) are adaptive because they protect the eye in anticipation of potentially harmful events. This protective mechanism is surprisingly inefficient because the acquisition of CRs requires extensive training - a condition that is unlikely to occur in nature. We hypothesized that the rate of conditioning in rabbits could depend on CS modality and that stimulating mystacial vibrissae as the CS could produce CR acquisition faster than the traditional auditory or visual stimulation. We tested this hypothesis by conditioning naïve rabbits in the delay paradigm using a weak airpuff CS (vCS) directed to the ipsilateral mystacial vibrissae. We found that the trigeminal vCS yields significantly faster CR acquisition. We next examined if vCS-evoked CRs are dependent on the intermediate cerebellum in the same fashion as CRs evoked by the traditional auditory CS. We found that vibrissal CRs could be abolished by inactivating the cerebellar interposed nuclei (IN) with muscimol. In addition, injections of picrotoxin in the IN shortened the onset latency of vibrissal CRs. These findings suggest that the tone and vCS-evoked CRs share similar cerebellar dependency.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21933685      PMCID: PMC3660855          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  47 in total

1.  Involvement of cerebral cortical structures in the classical conditioning of eyelid responses in rabbits.

Authors:  A Gruart; S Morcuende; S Martínez; J M Delgado-García
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Acquisition of eyeblink conditioning is critically dependent on normal function in cerebellar cortical lobule HVI.

Authors:  P J Attwell; S Rahman; C H Yeo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  GABA neurotransmission in the cerebellar interposed nuclei: involvement in classically conditioned eyeblinks and neuronal activity.

Authors:  D Aksenov; N Serdyukova; K Irwin; V Bracha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Neural substrates of eyeblink conditioning: acquisition and retention.

Authors:  Kimberly M Christian; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Eyeblink conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) with stimulation of the mystacial vibrissae as a conditioned stimulus.

Authors:  S Das; C Weiss; J F Disterhoft
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Inactivation of cerebellar output axons impairs acquisition of conditioned eyeblinks.

Authors:  W U Nilaweera; G D Zenitsky; V Bracha
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Localization of a memory trace in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  D J Krupa; J K Thompson; R F Thompson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1993-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Microinfusion of protein kinase inhibitor H7 into the cerebellum impairs the acquisition but not the retention of classical eyeblink conditioning in rabbits.

Authors:  G Chen; J E Steinmetz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-02-21       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Somatosensory Trigeminal Projections to the Inferior Olive, Cerebellum and other Precerebellar Nuclei in Rabbits.

Authors:  Jacqueline J. Van Ham; Christopher H. Yeo
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 10.  The cerebellum and eye-blink conditioning: learning versus network performance hypotheses.

Authors:  V Bracha; S Zbarska; K Parker; A Carrel; G Zenitsky; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  4 in total

1.  Purkinje cell activity during classical conditioning with different conditional stimuli explains central tenet of Rescorla–Wagner model [corrected].

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Riccardo Zucca; Fredrik Johansson; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cerebellar-dependent expression of motor learning during eyeblink conditioning in head-fixed mice.

Authors:  Shane A Heiney; Margot P Wohl; Selmaan N Chettih; Luis I Ruffolo; Javier F Medina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Blocking glutamate-mediated inferior olivary signals abolishes expression of conditioned eyeblinks but does not prevent their acquisition.

Authors:  Andrew J Carrel; Gary D Zenitsky; Vlastislav Bracha
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Consensus Paper: Towards a Systems-Level View of Cerebellar Function: the Interplay Between Cerebellum, Basal Ganglia, and Cortex.

Authors:  Daniele Caligiore; Giovanni Pezzulo; Gianluca Baldassarre; Andreea C Bostan; Peter L Strick; Kenji Doya; Rick C Helmich; Michiel Dirkx; James Houk; Henrik Jörntell; Angel Lago-Rodriguez; Joseph M Galea; R Chris Miall; Traian Popa; Asha Kishore; Paul F M J Verschure; Riccardo Zucca; Ivan Herreros
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.847

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.