Literature DB >> 17222920

Inferior olivary inactivation abolishes conditioned eyeblinks: extinction or cerebellar malfunction?

S Zbarska1, E A Holland, J R Bloedel, V Bracha.   

Abstract

The inferior olive (IO) is a required component of neural circuits controlling the classical conditioning of eyeblink responses. Previous reports indicated that lesioning or inactivating the IO abolishes conditioned eyeblinks (CRs), but there was disagreement regarding the timing of the CR performance deficit. As a result, it was not clear whether IO inactivation produces unlearning of CRs or a non-specific dysfunction of cerebellar circuits. Since most of these studies used methods that could block unrelated axons passing through the IO region, additional experiments are required to further elucidate IO function, using inactivating agents that act selectively on cell bodies. In the present study, the IO was inactivated using the glutamate receptor antagonist DGG and the GABA-A receptor agonist muscimol in rabbits performing well-learned CRs. Effects of inactivating the IO on CR expression and on neuronal activity in the anterior cerebellar interposed nucleus (IN) were examined. We found that either blocking excitatory glutamate inputs or activating inhibitory GABA inputs to the IO abolished CRs. This effect occurred with variable delay following drug injections. Additional experiments, in which post-injection testing was delayed to allow for drug diffusion, revealed invariably immediate suppression of CRs. This demonstrated that suppressing IO activity using DGG or muscimol does not induce unlearning of CRs. Single-unit recording during DGG injections revealed that CR suppression was paralleled by a dramatic suppression of IN neuronal activity. We concluded that inactivating the rostral parts of the IO complex abolishes CRs by producing a tonic malfunction of cerebellar eyeblink conditioning circuits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17222920     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Multiple sites of extinction for a single learned response.

Authors:  Brian E Kalmbach; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Number of spikes in climbing fibers determines the direction of cerebellar learning.

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Riccardo Zucca; Fredrik Johansson; Pär Svensson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-14       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Neural circuitry and plasticity mechanisms underlying delay eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Adam B Steinmetz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Assessing the role of inferior olivary sensory signaling in the expression of conditioned eyeblinks using a combined glutamate/GABAA receptor antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Svitlana Zbarska; Vlastislav Bracha
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cerebellum Involvement in Dystonia During Associative Motor Learning: Insights From a Data-Driven Spiking Network Model.

Authors:  Alice Geminiani; Aurimas Mockevičius; Egidio D'Angelo; Claudia Casellato
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  Sensory prediction or motor control? Application of marr-albus type models of cerebellar function to classical conditioning.

Authors:  Nathan F Lepora; John Porrill; Christopher H Yeo; Paul Dean
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Blocking glutamate-mediated inferior olivary signals abolishes expression of conditioned eyeblinks but does not prevent their acquisition.

Authors:  Andrew J Carrel; Gary D Zenitsky; Vlastislav Bracha
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  The cerebellum and eye-blink conditioning: learning versus network performance hypotheses.

Authors:  V Bracha; S Zbarska; K Parker; A Carrel; G Zenitsky; J R Bloedel
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-12-30       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Memory consolidation in the cerebellar cortex.

Authors:  Daniel O Kellett; Izumi Fukunaga; Eva Chen-Kubota; Paul Dean; Christopher H Yeo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.