Literature DB >> 19152356

Events per person-time (incidence rate): a misleading statistic?

Helena Chmura Kraemer1.   

Abstract

Results in risk studies based on events per person-time (EPT, technically 'incidence rate') often prove non-confirmable. The circumstances in which the EPT-ratio is unquestionably both valid and optimal to compare a high- and low-risk group, a constant hazards situation, are discussed. However, the constant hazards situation seldom applies in medical research. When the constant hazards situation does not apply, even under optimal circumstances, with fixed entry time and follow-up time for all those not experiencing the event and absence of censoring, EPT-ratio yields at best ambiguous, at worst misleading, results. More careful design and survival analyses are recommended in place of use of EPTs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19152356     DOI: 10.1002/sim.3525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Risk.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Michael G Hudgens; M Alan Brookhart; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Trends in Antibiotic Use by Birth Season and Birth Year.

Authors:  Alan C Kinlaw; Til Stürmer; Jennifer L Lund; Lars Pedersen; Michael D Kappelman; Julie L Daniels; Trine Frøslev; Christina D Mack; Henrik Toft Sørensen
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Using administrative data to identify U.S. Army soldiers at high-risk of perpetrating minor violent crimes.

Authors:  Anthony J Rosellini; John Monahan; Amy E Street; Eric D Hill; Maria Petukhova; Ben Y Reis; Nancy A Sampson; David M Benedek; Paul Bliese; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Predicting non-familial major physical violent crime perpetration in the US Army from administrative data.

Authors:  A J Rosellini; J Monahan; A E Street; S G Heeringa; E D Hill; M Petukhova; B Y Reis; N A Sampson; P Bliese; M Schoenbaum; M B Stein; R J Ursano; R C Kessler
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Modelling the time to onset of adverse reactions with parametric survival distributions: a potential approach to signal detection and evaluation.

Authors:  François Maignen; Manfred Hauben; Panos Tsintis
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Predicting Sexual Assault Perpetration in the U.S. Army Using Administrative Data.

Authors:  Anthony J Rosellini; John Monahan; Amy E Street; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; David M Benedek; Paul Bliese; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Epidemiological methods: about time.

Authors:  Helena Chmura Kraemer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Estimation of the standardized risk difference and ratio in a competing risks framework: application to injection drug use and progression to AIDS after initiation of antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Bryan Lau; Joseph J Eron; M Alan Brookhart; Mari M Kitahata; Jeffrey N Martin; William C Mathews; Michael J Mugavero
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  A new path for CF clinical trials through the use of historical controls.

Authors:  Amalia S Magaret; Mark Warden; Noah Simon; Sonya Heltshe; George Z Retsch-Bogart; Bonnie W Ramsey; Nicole Mayer-Hamblett
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Limitations of the incidence density ratio as approximation of the hazard ratio.

Authors:  Ralf Bender; Lars Beckmann
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.