Literature DB >> 11428876

Methods for identifying methicillin resistancein Staphylococcus aureus.

R W Smyth1, G Kahlmeter, B Olsson Liljequist, B Hoffman.   

Abstract

Five methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were used to examine a collection of 100 clinical isolates comprising both susceptible and resistant strains. The disc diffusion test with oxacillin had a sensitivity of 93.3% and a specificity of 92.0% whereas mannitol salt agar containing oxacillin had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity 80.6% with high inoculum. With a low inoculum the sensitivity was 90.7% and specificity 96.0%. The MRSA screen test (Denka Seiken Co. Ltd., Japan) and Evigene MRSA Detection Kit (State Serum Institute, Denmark) tests were in complete agreement with results obtained with polymerase chain reaction assays amplifying mecA and nuc gene sequences. Copyright 2001 The Hospital Infection Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11428876     DOI: 10.1053/jhin.2001.0933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  16 in total

1.  Interpretation of MRSASelect screening agar at 24 hours of incubation.

Authors:  Julie Carson; Betty Lui; Linda Rosmus; Howard Rennick; Jeff Fuller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Dutch guideline on the laboratory detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M F Q Kluytmans-van den Bergh; M C Vos; B M W Diederen; C M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; A Voss; J A J W Kluytmans
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Mannitol salt agar-cefoxitin combination as a screening medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R W Smyth; Gunnar Kahlmeter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: comparison of susceptibility testing methods and analysis of mecA-positive susceptible strains.

Authors:  G Sakoulas; H S Gold; L Venkataraman; P C DeGirolami; G M Eliopoulos; Q Qian
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Molecular diagnostics of clinically important staphylococci.

Authors:  J Stepán; R Pantůcek; J Doskar
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Rapid screening and identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples by selective-broth and real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  Hong Fang; Göran Hedin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of an isothermal signal amplification method for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patient-screening swabs.

Authors:  Katrina Levi; Claire Bailey; Alexandra Bennett; Peter Marsh; Don L N Cardy; Kevin J Towner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of different methods to detect methicillin resistance in small-colony variants of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Frank Kipp; Karsten Becker; Georg Peters; Christof von Eiff
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of mecA polymerase chain reaction with phenotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M M Baddour; M M AbuElKheir; A J Fatani
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  The first nosocomial outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses in Sweden.

Authors:  Karin Bergström; Anna Aspan; Annica Landén; Christopher Johnston; Ulrika Grönlund-Andersson
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 1.695

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.