Literature DB >> 15472303

Development and evaluation of a chromogenic agar medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

John D Perry1, Amie Davies, Lynne A Butterworth, Andrew L J Hopley, Audrey Nicholson, F Kate Gould.   

Abstract

We describe here the development and evaluation of MRSA ID, a new chromogenic agar medium for the specific isolation and identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We used S. aureus ID (bioMerieux, La Balme Les Grottes, France) and supplemented it with various antimicrobials, including cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, oxacillin, and methicillin. Cefoxitin proved to be superior to the other antimicrobials for the selection of MRSA from other strains of S. aureus. MRSA ID (consisting of S. aureus ID supplemented with 4 mg of cefoxitin/liter) was evaluated by the use of 747 swabs from various clinical sites. All specimens were also cultured on CHROMagar MRSA and oxacillin resistance screening agar base (ORSAB) and in selective mannitol broth (SMB). A total of 85 MRSA strains were isolated by a combination of all methods. After 22 to 24 h of incubation, 80% of the MRSA strains were isolated as green colonies on MRSA ID, compared with 59 and 62% of the strains that were isolated as colored colonies on CHROMagar MRSA and ORSAB, respectively. After 48 h of incubation, 89, 72, and 78% of the MRSA strains were isolated on MRSA ID, CHROMagar MRSA, and ORSAB, respectively. Sixty-five percent of the strains were isolated by growth in SMB. The specificities of MRSA ID, CHROMagar MRSA, ORSAB, and SMB were 99.5, 99.3, 97.9, and 92.8%, respectively, after 22 to 24 h of incubation. We conclude that MRSA ID is a sensitive and specific medium for the isolation and identification of MRSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15472303      PMCID: PMC522333          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4519-4523.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  27 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Mastalex latex agglutination test for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus grown on different screening media.

Authors:  D F Brown; E Walpole
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Evaluation of new medium, oxacillin resistance screening agar base, for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical specimens.

Authors:  A E Simor; J Goodfellow; L Louie; M Louie
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Control of multiply resistant cocci: do international comparisons help?

Authors:  S Harbarth; W Albrich; D A Goldmann; J Huebner
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Improved methods for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S Rohrer; M Tschierske; R Zbinden; B Berger-Bächi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 5.  Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the endemic hospital: what have we learned?

Authors:  B Rubinovitch; D Pittet
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  [Staphylococcus aureus: new detection of intrinsic resistance using the diffusion method].

Authors:  C Mougeot; J Guillaumat-Tailliet; J M Libert
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2001-04

7.  Evaluation of CHROMagar Staph. aureus, a new chromogenic medium, for isolation and presumptive identification of Staphylococcus aureus from human clinical specimens.

Authors:  O Gaillot; M Wetsch; N Fortineau; P Berche
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus: evaluation of five selective media.

Authors:  S Davies; P M Zadik; C M Mason; S J Whittaker
Journal:  Br J Biomed Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  Comparison of methods for the isolation of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  S Davies; P M Zadik
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Performance of the chromogenic medium CHROMagar Staph Aureus and the Staphychrom coagulase test in the detection and identification of Staphylococcus aureus in clinical specimens.

Authors:  A Carricajo; A Treny; N Fonsale; M Bes; M E Reverdy; Y Gille; G Aubert; A M Freydiere
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  37 in total

1.  Evolution of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci in a remote population.

Authors:  David Lebeaux; François Barbier; Cécile Angebault; Lahcene Benmahdi; Etienne Ruppé; Benjamin Felix; Kevin Gaillard; Félix Djossou; Loïc Epelboin; Claire Dupont; Magaly Renard; Gilles Peroz; François Vandenesch; Michel Wolff; Antoine Andremont; Raymond Ruimy
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Performance of CHROMagar MRSA medium for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Bram Diederen; Inge van Duijn; Alex van Belkum; Piet Willemse; Peter van Keulen; Jan Kluytmans
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Performance of MRSA ID, a new chromogenic medium for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Bram M W Diederen; Marie-Louise van Leest; Inge van Duijn; Piet Willemse; Peter H J van Keulen; Jan A J W Kluytmans
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Optimal surveillance culture sites for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in newborns.

Authors:  Alana Rosenthal; Diane White; Sheila Churilla; Sandra Brodie; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Combined use of Pastorex Staph-Plus and either of two new chromogenic agars, MRSA ID and CHROMagar MRSA, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Veerle Compernolle; Gerda Verschraegen; Geert Claeys
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium, MRSA select, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Lisa Louie; Deirdre Soares; Helen Meaney; Mary Vearncombe; Andrew E Simor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens : Comparison of MRSA chromogenic media.

Authors:  C Nonhoff; O Denis; A Brenner; P Buidin; N Legros; C Thiroux; M Dramaix; M J Struelens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Chromogenic media for MRSA diagnostics.

Authors:  Zhenbo Xu; Yuchao Hou; Brian M Peters; Dingqiang Chen; Bing Li; Lin Li; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.