Literature DB >> 19135077

Face composite effects reveal abnormal face processing in Autism spectrum disorders.

Isabel Gauthier1, Cheryl Klaiman, Robert T Schultz.   

Abstract

Although it has been suggested that individuals with an Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) process faces less holistically than typically developing controls, there are few direct investigations of this hypothesis. This question was addressed before using the composite paradigm (Teunisse, J. P., & de Gelder, B. (2003). Face processing in adolescents with autistic disorder: The inversion and composite effects. Brain Cognition, 52(3), 285-294.). The results had revealed that adolescents with ASDs were less sensitive than controls to the misalignment of face parts and it was concluded their face processing was less holistic. However, because of shortcomings of the design, it was not possible to distinguish whether individuals with Autism processed both aligned and misaligned composites in a part-based fashion, or both in a holistic fashion. We compared adolescents with ASDs to controls matched on sex, age and IQ on a more complete version of the composite paradigm. The results indicate that individuals with ASDs, like controls, experience interference from facial features that they are told to ignore. However, while such interference is released for controls if parts of face composites are misaligned, individuals with ASDs show comparable interference from irrelevant parts regardless of alignment. Two different interpretations are discussed, both compatible with the idea that perceptual and or attentional abnormalities in ASDs result in a diminished level of expertise for faces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19135077      PMCID: PMC2674961          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  42 in total

1.  Evidence for holistic processing of faces viewed as photographic negatives.

Authors:  G J Hole; P A George; V Dunsmore
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.490

2.  A normed study of face recognition in autism and related disorders.

Authors:  A Klin; S S Sparrow; A de Bildt; D V Cicchetti; D J Cohen; F R Volkmar
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  1999-12

3.  Impairment in holistic face processing following early visual deprivation.

Authors:  Richard Le Grand; Catherine J Mondloch; Daphne Maurer; Henry P Brent
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2004-11

4.  Holistic processing of faces: perceptual and decisional components.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier; Michael J Wenger; Thomas J Palmeri
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Are there emotion perception deficits in young autistic children?

Authors:  S Ozonoff; B F Pennington; S J Rogers
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 8.982

6.  Recognition of faces: an approach to the study of autism.

Authors:  T Langdell
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 8.982

7.  Differences in discrimination of eye and mouth displacement in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  M D Rutherford; Kathleen A Clements; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Face perception in high-functioning autistic adults: evidence for superior processing of face parts, not for a configural face-processing deficit.

Authors:  A Lahaie; L Mottron; M Arguin; C Berthiaume; B Jemel; D Saumier
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Impaired face processing in autism: fact or artifact?

Authors:  Boutheina Jemel; Laurent Mottron; Michelle Dawson
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-01

10.  What's in a face? The case of autism.

Authors:  R P Hobson; J Ouston; A Lee
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1988-11
View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Facial emotion recognition in autism spectrum disorders: a review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Madeline B Harms; Alex Martin; Gregory L Wallace
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 2.  A meta-analysis and review of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The Vanderbilt holistic face processing test: a short and reliable measure of holistic face processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Interactions between concentric form-from-structure and face perception revealed by visual masking but not adaptation.

Authors:  Eric Feczko; Gordon L Shulman; Steven E Petersen; John R Pruett
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 5.  The composite face illusion.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Katie L H Gray; Richard Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

6.  Rigid facial motion influences featural, but not holistic, face processing.

Authors:  Naiqi G Xiao; Paul C Quinn; Liezhong Ge; Kang Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Perceptual Expertise as a Shift from Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Yetta K Wong; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-04-15

8.  Beliefs alter holistic face processing ... if response bias is not taken into account.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Olivia S Cheung; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 9.  The "Eye Avoidance" Hypothesis of Autism Face Processing.

Authors:  James W Tanaka; Andrew Sung
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-05

10.  Reliability of composite-task measurements of holistic face processing.

Authors:  David A Ross; Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2015-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.