Literature DB >> 24563526

Interactions between concentric form-from-structure and face perception revealed by visual masking but not adaptation.

Eric Feczko1, Gordon L Shulman, Steven E Petersen, John R Pruett.   

Abstract

Findings from diverse subfields of vision research suggest a potential link between high-level aspects of face perception and concentric form-from-structure perception. To explore this relationship, typical adults performed two adaptation experiments and two masking experiments to test whether concentric, but not nonconcentric, Glass patterns (a type of form-from-structure stimulus) utilize a processing mechanism shared by face perception. For the adaptation experiments, subjects were presented with an adaptor for 5 or 20 s, prior to discriminating a target. In the masking experiments, subjects saw a mask, then a target, and then a second mask. Measures of discriminability and bias were derived and repeated measures analysis of variance tested for pattern-specific masking and adaptation effects. Results from Experiment 1 show no Glass pattern-specific effect of adaptation to faces; results from Experiment 2 show concentric Glass pattern masking, but not adaptation, may impair upright/inverted face discrimination; results from Experiment 3 show concentric and radial Glass pattern masking impaired subsequent upright/inverted face discrimination more than translational Glass pattern masking; and results from Experiment 4 show concentric and radial Glass pattern masking impaired subsequent face gender discrimination more than translational Glass pattern masking. Taken together, these findings demonstrate interactions between concentric form-from-structure and face processing, suggesting a possible common processing pathway.

Keywords:  Glass patterns; face perception; holistic processing; moire perception; visual adaptation; visual masking

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24563526      PMCID: PMC3934487          DOI: 10.1167/14.2.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  72 in total

1.  Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing.

Authors:  Allison B Sekuler; Carl M Gaspar; Jason M Gold; Patrick J Bennett
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Configural masking of faces: evidence for high-level interactions in face perception.

Authors:  Gunter Loffler; Gael E Gordon; Frances Wilkinson; Deborah Goren; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-03-19       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Detecting structure in glass patterns: an interocular transfer study.

Authors:  Dawn Vreven; Jarrod Berge
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.490

Review 4.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  A masking analysis of glass pattern perception.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search.

Authors:  L Chelazzi; J Duncan; E K Miller; R Desimone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The Thatcher illusion as a test of configural disruption.

Authors:  M B Lewis; R A Johnston
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  A biologically plausible model of human shape symmetry perception.

Authors:  Frédéric J A M Poirier; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Atypical development of face and greeble recognition in autism.

Authors:  K Suzanne Scherf; Marlene Behrmann; Nancy Minshew; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 8.982

10.  Differences in discrimination of eye and mouth displacement in autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  M D Rutherford; Kathleen A Clements; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-06-07       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  1 in total

1.  Attention Alterations in Pediatric Anxiety: Evidence From Behavior and Neuroimaging.

Authors:  Michael T Perino; Qiongru Yu; Michael J Myers; Jennifer C Harper; William T Baumel; Steven E Petersen; Deanna M Barch; Joan L Luby; Chad M Sylvester
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 12.810

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.