Literature DB >> 19132411

"When will I recover?" A national survey on patients' and physicians' expectations concerning the recovery time for acute back pain.

Serge Perrot1, F A Allaert, V Concas, F Laroche.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare patients' and physicians' expectations concerning the recovery time for acute back pain, and their determinants. A French national observational survey was performed between October and December 2005. Each physician was asked to include the first three patients aged between 20 and 70 years presenting with acute back pain (VAS > 40 mm) of less than 1 month's duration. A total number of 1982 patients, with a mean age of 48.4 +/- 11.8 years (52.2% men), were enrolled by 834 physicians. Patients and their physicians expected recovery to take the same amount of time in 60.3% of cases (Kappa = 0.43). In 17.4% of cases, patients predicted a shorter recovery time than physicians, and in 22.4% of cases, patients predicted a longer recovery time. Both patients and physicians expected recovery time to be longer in women, and in older, unmarried, obese, and non working patients. Expected recovery time was also longer in patients with no sports activities, low back pain (as opposed to pain at other sites), a high level of disability, a history of back pain, and no triggering factor. The intensity of pain and the number of days of sick leave taken did not affect the patient's prediction of recovery time, but did affect the physicians' expectations. Physicians considered professional status, analgesic intake and previous sick leave to be independent predictive factors, whereas patients did not. Expected recovery time, assessed shortly after the onset of acute back pain is influenced by most of the clinical and demographic factors usually considered risk factors for chronic low back pain. Patients' predictions of recovery time should be assessed in acute back pain, to identify risks for expected chronicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19132411      PMCID: PMC2899418          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0868-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  35 in total

1.  Work-related recovery expectations and the prognosis of chronic low back pain within a workers' compensation setting.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Length of disability and cost of workers' compensation low back pain claims.

Authors:  L Hashemi; B S Webster; E A Clancy; E Volinn
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.162

Review 3.  The course of back pain in primary care.

Authors:  M Von Korff; K Saunders
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Do patient and physician expectations predict response to pain-relieving procedures?

Authors:  B S Galer; L Schwartz; J A Turner
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.442

5.  Listening to injured workers: how recovery expectations predict outcomes--a prospective study.

Authors:  Donald C Cole; Michael V Mondloch; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Katja Boersma
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Predicting long-term disability in low back injured workers presenting to a spine consultant.

Authors:  T R Lehmann; K F Spratt; K K Lehmann
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Low back pain, disability and back pain myths in a community sample: prevalence and interrelationships.

Authors:  Liesbet Goubert; Geert Crombez; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.931

9.  Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice.

Authors:  J Coste; G Delecoeuillerie; A Cohen de Lara; J M Le Parc; J B Paolaggi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-26

10.  Role of patients' view of their illness in predicting return to work and functioning after myocardial infarction: longitudinal study.

Authors:  K J Petrie; J Weinman; N Sharpe; J Buckley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Physical therapists familiarity and beliefs about health services utilization and health seeking behaviour.

Authors:  Derek Clewley; Dan Rhon; Tim Flynn; Shane Koppenhaver; Chad Cook
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The Influence of Expectancies on Pain and Function Over Time After Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Junie S Carriere; Marc Olivier Martel; Marco L Loggia; Claudia M Campbell; Michael T Smith; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Robert R Edwards
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.637

3.  Clinically significant weight gain 1 year after occupational back injury.

Authors:  Benjamin J Keeney; Deborah Fulton-Kehoe; Thomas M Wickizer; Judith A Turner; Kwun Chuen Gary Chan; Gary M Franklin
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Tramadol/paracetamol fixed-dose combination in the treatment of moderate to severe pain.

Authors:  Joseph V Pergolizzi; Mart van de Laar; Richard Langford; Hans-Ulrich Mellinghoff; Ignacio Morón Merchante; Srinivas Nalamachu; Joanne O'Brien; Serge Perrot; Robert B Raffa
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Obesity is associated with more disability at presentation and after treatment in low back pain but not in neck pain: findings from the OIOC registry.

Authors:  Maria M Wertli; Ulrike Held; Marco Campello; Shira Schecter Weiner
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.