Literature DB >> 9112707

The course of back pain in primary care.

M Von Korff1, K Saunders.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Review paper of outcome studies among primary care back pain patients.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the short-term and long-term pain and functional outcomes of patients with back pain who are seeking treatment in primary care settings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Back pain has been viewed as running either an acute or a chronic course, but most patients experience recurrent back pain. This review summarizes outcome studies in light of the episodic course of back pain.
METHODS: Studies reporting pain and functional outcome data for consecutive primary care patients with back pain were reviewed.
RESULTS: Back pain among primary care patients typically is a recurrent condition for which definitions of acute and chronic pain based on a single episode are inadequate. Because a majority of patients experience recurrences, describing only the outcome of the initial back pain episode may convey a more favorable picture of long-term outcome than warranted. For the short-term follow-up evaluation, most patients improve considerably during the first 4 weeks after seeking treatment. Sixty-six percent to 75% continue to experience at least mild back pain 1 month after seeking care. At 1 month, approximately 33% report continuing pain of at least moderate intensity, whereas 20-25% report substantial activity limitations. For the long-term follow-up (1 year or more) period, approximately 33% report intermittent or persistent pain of at least moderate intensity, one in seven continue to report back pain of severe intensity, and one in five report substantial activity limitations.
CONCLUSION: Results from existing studies suggest that back pain among primary care patients typically runs a recurrent course characterized by variation and change, rather than an acute, self-limiting course.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9112707     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  85 in total

Review 1.  Rheumatology: 13. Minimizing disability in patients with low-back pain.

Authors:  P C Wing
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Discography: A Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

3.  Self-efficacy and health locus of control: relationship to occupational disability among workers with back pain.

Authors:  Sylvie Richard; Clermont E Dionne; Arie Nouwen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-09

4.  Multiple Myeloma presenting as sacroiliac joint pain: a case report.

Authors:  Danielle Southerst; John Dufton; Paula Stern
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-06

5.  Health care use associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorders among hospital workers.

Authors:  Mieke Koehoorn; Donald C Cole; Clyde Hertzman; Hyunmi Lee
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

Review 6.  Pain assessment.

Authors:  Mathias Haefeli; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) versus placebo for chronic low-back pain.

Authors:  Amole Khadilkar; Daniel Oluwafemi Odebiyi; Lucie Brosseau; George A Wells
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

8.  Low pressure pain thresholds are associated with, but does not predispose for, low back pain.

Authors:  Søren O'Neill; Per Kjær; Thomas Graven-Nielsen; Claus Manniche; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  The pharmacology of nociceptor priming.

Authors:  Ram Kandasamy; Theodore J Price
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2015

Review 10.  Low back pain (chronic).

Authors:  Hamilton Hall; Greg McIntosh
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.