Literature DB >> 15207520

Low back pain, disability and back pain myths in a community sample: prevalence and interrelationships.

Liesbet Goubert1, Geert Crombez, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij.   

Abstract

This study investigated the prevalence of back pain, disability, and, of most importance, the presence of misconceptions about low back pain (LBP), its diagnosis and treatment in a bicultural community sample (Belgium). Using the Graded Chronic Pain Scale [Pain 50 (1992) 133] persons were classified according to pain intensity and disability in five subgroups. The interrelationship between LBP beliefs and these five subgroups was also investigated. In our sample (n=1624) the 6-month prevalence of low back pain was 41.8%. Only in 8.2% back pain was disabling. Misconceptions about back pain were widespread, even in the group reporting no back pain. The least misconceptions were found to exist in participants with mild LBP without disability. It is suggested that recovery from an episode of acute low back pain is an active process that involves a correction of beliefs about harm, about the need to restrict physical activities and about medical diagnosis and cure. Finally, it is argued that community actions may be useful to correct LBP myths in order to prevent the development of long-term disability due to LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15207520     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  35 in total

1.  The role of physical workload and pain related fear in the development of low back pain in young workers: evidence from the BelCoBack Study; results after one year of follow up.

Authors:  A Van Nieuwenhuyse; P R Somville; G Crombez; A Burdorf; G Verbeke; K Johannik; O Van den Bergh; R Masschelein; Ph Mairiaux; G F Moens
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Back education in elementary schoolchildren: the effects of adding a physical activity promotion program to a back care program.

Authors:  Greet M Cardon; Dirk L R de Clercq; Elisabeth J A Geldhof; Stefanie Verstraete; Ilse M M de Bourdeaudhuij
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Chronic Pain Grade questionnaire in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Andrea Stancati; Walter Grassi
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Back posture education in elementary schoolchildren: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Geldhof; Greet Cardon; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Subclassification of low back pain: a cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Evdokia V Billis; Christopher J McCarthy; Jacqueline A Oldham
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  A review of assessment tools of illness representations: are these adapted for a work disability prevention context?

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Marie-José Durand; Raymond Baril; Marie-Elise Labrecque; Suzy Ngomo; Daniel Côté; Annick Rouleau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-08-22

Review 7.  Self-management of chronic low back pain and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Stephen May
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 8.  Representations: an important key to understanding workers' coping behaviors during rehabilitation and the return-to-work process.

Authors:  Marie-France Coutu; Raymond Baril; Marie-José Durand; Daniel Côté; Annick Rouleau
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2007-06-13

9.  Chronic low back pain: non-clinical factors impacting on management by Irish doctors.

Authors:  B M Fullen; C Doody; G David Baxter; L E Daly; D A Hurley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Development and validation of the self-administered Fibromyalgia Assessment Status: a disease-specific composite measure for evaluating treatment effect.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Rita Girolimetti; Stefania Gasparini; Fabiola Atzeni; Walter Grassi
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.