Literature DB >> 19131137

Evaluation of different procedures for the optimized detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in mussels and environmental samples.

V Blanco-Abad1, J Ansede-Bermejo, A Rodriguez-Castro, J Martinez-Urtaza.   

Abstract

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a marine bacterium with a worldwide distribution and is frequently associated with human outbreaks of infection. Detection and isolation of V. parahaemolyticus from natural sources is often problematical because of limitations in the analytical procedures. We evaluated a combination of conventional and molecular protocols previously described for the investigation of V. parahaemolyticus, with the aim of identifying the best procedures for improved detection of this organism in environmental matrixes. A total of 259 samples of zooplankton (103), mussels (48) and seawater (108) were investigated by an Absence-Presence method (A/P), whereas 118 samples of zooplankton (70) and mussels (48) were analyzed by the Most Probable Number (MPN) method. All samples were processed by a two-step enrichment procedure, firstly with APW broth and then with SPB as selective secondary broth. Detection of V. parahaemolyticus was by direct-PCR and by plate culture on TCBS and CHROMagar Vibrio, after sample enrichment in APW and SPB. With the A/P method, V. parahaemolyticus was detected in 23.6% samples by direct-PCR, whereas only 11.2% samples were positive with the plate culture method. With the MPN method, V. parahaemolyticus was detected in 54.2% and 27.1% of the samples by direct-PCR and plate culture respectively; this indicated the existence of 31% false negative results with the A/P method. No significant differences between the use of a single (APW) or two-step enrichment (APW+SPB) were observed by direct-PCR with A/P or MPN, although a significant higher presence of V. parahaemolyticus was detected by plate culture in both protocols with the two-step enrichment procedure. In conclusion, direct-PCR after sample enrichment in APW broth was the most successful method for detection of V. parahaemolyticus with the A/P procedure and enumeration by MPN. Better detection was obtained with MPN than with the A/P protocol. Conversely, the plate culture procedure showed better results with the two-step enrichment protocol in which CHROMagar Vibrio was used as the selective agar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19131137     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  19 in total

1.  Predictive models for the effect of storage temperature on Vibrio parahaemolyticus viability and counts of total viable bacteria in Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas).

Authors:  Judith Fernandez-Piquer; John P Bowman; Tom Ross; Mark L Tamplin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium, chromID Vibrio, for the isolation and presumptive identification of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus from human clinical specimens.

Authors:  R Eddabra; Y Piemont; J M Scheftel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Quantification of Vibrio species in oysters from the Gulf of Mexico with two procedures based on MPN and PCR.

Authors:  Guadalupe Barrera-Escorcia; Irma Wong-Chang; Carlos Leopoldo Fernández-Rendón; Alfonso Vázquez Botello; Bruno Gómez-Gil; Marcial Leonardo Lizárraga-Partida
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Development of a matrix tool for the prediction of Vibrio species in oysters harvested from North Carolina.

Authors:  B A Froelich; M Ayrapetyan; P Fowler; J D Oliver; R T Noble
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Ecological determinants of the occurrence and dynamics of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in offshore areas.

Authors:  Jaime Martinez-Urtaza; Veronica Blanco-Abad; Alba Rodriguez-Castro; Juan Ansede-Bermejo; Ana Miranda; M Xose Rodriguez-Alvarez
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Quantification of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio cholerae in French Mediterranean coastal lagoons.

Authors:  Franck Cantet; Dominique Hervio-Heath; Audrey Caro; Cécile Le Mennec; Caroline Monteil; Catherine Quéméré; Anne Jolivet-Gougeon; Rita R Colwell; Patrick Monfort
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.992

7.  Vibrio harveyi adheres to and penetrates tissues of the European abalone Haliotis tuberculata within the first hours of contact.

Authors:  Marion Cardinaud; Annaïck Barbou; Carole Capitaine; Adeline Bidault; Antoine Marie Dujon; Dario Moraga; Christine Paillard
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Seasonal and Geographical Differences in Total and Pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Vibrio vulnificus Levels in Seawater and Oysters from the Delaware and Chesapeake Bays Determined Using Several Methods.

Authors:  Salina Parveen; John Jacobs; Gulnihal Ozbay; Lathadevi K Chintapenta; Esam Almuhaideb; Joan Meredith; Sylvia Ossai; Amanda Abbott; Ar'Quette Grant; Kathy Brohawn; Paulinus Chigbu; Gary P Richards
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Development of enhanced selective media for detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters.

Authors:  Jae-Hyun Yoon; Young-Min Bae; Hana Song; Soyul Lee; Sung-Kwon Moon; Se-Wook Oh; Sun-Young Lee
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 2.391

10.  Molecular epidemiology and genetic variation of pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Peru.

Authors:  Ronnie G Gavilan; Maria L Zamudio; Jaime Martinez-Urtaza
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2013-05-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.