Literature DB >> 27709461

Quantification of Vibrio species in oysters from the Gulf of Mexico with two procedures based on MPN and PCR.

Guadalupe Barrera-Escorcia1, Irma Wong-Chang2, Carlos Leopoldo Fernández-Rendón2, Alfonso Vázquez Botello2, Bruno Gómez-Gil3, Marcial Leonardo Lizárraga-Partida4.   

Abstract

Oysters can accumulate potentially pathogenic water bacteria. The objective of this study was to compare two procedures to quantify Vibrio species present in oysters to determine the most sensitive method. We analyzed oyster samples from the Gulf of Mexico, commercialized in Mexico City. The samples were inoculated in tubes with alkaline peptone water (APW), based on three tubes and four dilutions (10-1 to 10-4). From these tubes, the first quantification of Vibrio species was performed (most probable number (MPN) from tubes) and bacteria were inoculated by streaking on thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) petri dishes. Colonies were isolated for a second quantification (MPN from dishes). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to determine species with specific primers: ompW for Vibrio cholerae, tlh for Vibrio parahaemolyticus, and VvhA for Vibrio vulnificus. Simultaneously, the sanitary quality of oysters was determined. The quantification of V. parahaemolyticus was significantly higher in APW tubes than in TCBS dishes. Regarding V. vulnificus counts, the differences among both approaches were not significant. In contrast, the MPNs of V. cholerae obtained from dishes were higher than from tubes. The quantification of MPNs through PCR of V. parahaemolyticus and V. vulnificus obtained from APW was sensitive and recommendable for the detection of both species. In contrast, to quantify V. cholerae, it was necessary to isolate colonies on TCBS prior PCR. Culturing in APW at 42 °C could be an alternative to avoid colony isolation. The MPNs of V. cholerae from dishes was associated with the bad sanitary quality of the samples.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Most probable number; Oysters’ sanitary quality; V. parahaemolyticus; V. vulnificus; Vibrio cholerae

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27709461     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5620-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  10 in total

Review 1.  Updated perspectives on emerging vibrios associated with human infections.

Authors:  G M Tantillo; M Fontanarosa; A Di Pinto; M Musti
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.858

2.  Pertinence of indicator organisms and sampling variables to Vibrio concentrations.

Authors:  E G Koh; J H Huyn; P A LaRock
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Bacterial and viral pathogens in live oysters: 2007 United States market survey.

Authors:  Angelo DePaola; Jessica L Jones; Jacquelina Woods; William Burkhardt; Kevin R Calci; Jeffrey A Krantz; John C Bowers; Kuppuswamy Kasturi; Robin H Byars; Emily Jacobs; Donna Williams-Hill; Khamphet Nabe
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by the pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus O3:K6 in Mexico.

Authors:  Héctor Cabanillas-Beltrán; Eduardo LLausás-Magaña; Ricardo Romero; Abel Espinoza; Alejandra García-Gasca; Mitsuaki Nishibuchi; Masanori Ishibashi; Bruno Gomez-Gil
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.742

5.  [Quantitative detection of Vibrio vulnificus in seafood].

Authors:  Yukiko Hara-Kud; Norinaga Miwa; Syougo Yamasaki; Jun Yatsuyanagi; Yoshito Iwade; Hajime Takahash; Jiro Miyasaka
Journal:  Kansenshogaku Zasshi       Date:  2005-12

6.  Environmental investigation of potentially pathogenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in the Seto-Inland Sea, Japan.

Authors:  Muhammad Jahangir Alam; Ken Ichi Tomochika; Shin Ichi Miyoshi; Sumio Shinoda
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 2.742

7.  Rapid quantitative detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood by MPN-PCR.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Luan; Jixiang Chen; Yu Liu; Yun Li; Juntao Jia; Rui Liu; Xiao-Hua Zhang
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Evaluation of different procedures for the optimized detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in mussels and environmental samples.

Authors:  V Blanco-Abad; J Ansede-Bermejo; A Rodriguez-Castro; J Martinez-Urtaza
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 5.277

9.  Elevated temperature method for recovery of Vibrio cholerae from oysters (Crassostrea gigas).

Authors:  A DePaola; C A Kaysner; R M McPhearson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Evaluation of MPN method combined with PCR procedure for detection and enumeration of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood.

Authors:  Norinaga Miwa; Tomohiro Nishio; Yono Arita; Fumihiko Kawamori; Takashi Masuda; Masato Akiyama
Journal:  Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 0.464

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Simultaneous isolation and enumeration of virulent Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio vulnificus using an advanced MPN-PCR method.

Authors:  Jae-Hwa Lee; Seul-Ki Park; Fazlurrahman Khan; Du-Min Jo; Do-Ha Lee; Min-Gyun Kang; Young-Mog Kim
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.552

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.