| Literature DB >> 19125189 |
Jean-Louis Herrmann1, Marie Belloy, Raphael Porcher, Nancy Simonney, Rola Aboutaam, Muriel Lebourgeois, Joel Gaudelus, Laure De Losangeles, Katarina Chadelat, Pierre Scheinmann, Nicole Beydon, Brigitte Fauroux, Martine Bingen, Mustapha Terki, Dominique Barraud, Philippe Cruaud, Catherine Offredo, Agnes Ferroni, Patrick Berche, Didier Moissenet, Hoang Vuthien, Catherine Doit, Edouard Bingen, Philippe Henri Lagrange.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Development of T-cells based-Interferon gamma (IFNgamma) assays has offered new possibilities for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) and active disease in adults. Few studies have been performed in children, none in France. With reference to the published data on childhood TB epidemiology in the Paris and Ile de France Region, we considered it important to evaluate the performance of IGRA (QuantiFERON TB Gold In Tube(R), QF-TB-IT) in the diagnosis and the follow-up through treatment of LTBI and active TB in a cohort of French children. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19125189 PMCID: PMC2607538 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the enrolled children
| Variable | Controls | Healthy contacts | Latent TB | Active TB | Total |
| No. patients | 31 | 12 | 54 | 32 | 129 |
| Gender, no. (%) | |||||
| F | 14 (45) | 6 (50) | 26 (48) | 17 (53) | 63 (49) |
| M | 17 (55) | 6 (50) | 28 (52) | 15 (47) | 66 (51) |
| Median age (range), ys | 6.5 (0.3 to 15.6) | 2.4 (0.2 to 16.9) | 9.2 (0.5 to 17) | 7.3 (0.9 to 17.1) | 7.4 (0.2 to 17) |
| Country of birth, no. (%) | |||||
| France | 25 (81) | 9 (75) | 37 (69) | 18 (56) | 89 (69) |
| Southern Europe and Mediterranean | 0 (0) | 3 (25) | 2 (4) | 1 (3) | 6 (5) |
| Africa | 4 (13) | 0 (0) | 9 (17) | 8 (25) | 21 (16) |
| East Asia | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (6) | 3 (9) | 6 (5) |
| Caribbean islands | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 1 (3) | 2 (2) |
| Unknown | 2 (6) | 0 (0) | 2 (4) | 1 (3) | 5 (4) |
| BCG vaccination, no. (%) | |||||
| Yes | 29 (94) | 10 (83) | 50 (93) | 29 (91) | 118 (91) |
| No | 2 (6) | 2 (17) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 5 (4) |
| Unknown | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (6) | 3 (9) | 6 (5) |
| Health coverage, no. (%) | 28 (100) | 11 (100) | 48 (96) | 25 (96) | 112 (97) |
| Family contact, no. (%) | |||||
| Yes | 1 (3) | 7 (58) | 32 (59) | 12 (38) | 52 (40) |
| No | 11 (35) | 1 (8) | 11 (20) | 14 (44) | 37 (29) |
| Unknown | 19 (61) | 4 (33) | 11 (20) | 6 (19) | 40 (31) |
| TST induration diameter (mm), no. (%) | |||||
| No. (%) tested | 12 (39) | 11 (92) | 53 (98) | 31 (97) | 107 (83) |
| 0–4 | 6 (50) | 6 (55) | 2 (4) | 4 (13) | 18 (17) |
| 5–9 | 1 (8) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 0 (0) | 2 (2) |
| 10–15 | 4 (33) | 3 (27) | 16 (30) | 9 (29) | 32 (30) |
| >15 | 1 (8) | 2 (18) | 34 (64) | 18 (58) | 55 (51) |
| TST conversion, no. (%) | |||||
| No | 22 (71) | 8 (67) | 9 (17) | 9 (28) | 48 (37) |
| Yes | 1 (3) | 4 (33) | 44 (81) | 21 (66) | 70 (54) |
| Unknown | 8 (26) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 2 (6) | 11 (9) |
| Previous tuberculosis | |||||
| Child | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2) | 1 (3) | 2 (2) |
| Family | 3 (10) | 6 (50) | 36 (67) | 13 (41) | 58 (45) |
| Unknown | 6 (19) | 1 (8) | 5 (9) | 5 (16) | 17 (13) |
Clinical, microbiological and treatment characteristics of the children population
| Variable | Healthy contacts | Latent TB | Active TB | Total |
| No. patients | 12 | 54 | 32 | 98 |
| Chest X-ray, no. (%) | ||||
| Negative | 10 (83) | 50 (93) | 7 (22) | 67 (68) |
| Positive | 1 (8) | 2 (4) | 25 (78) | 28 (29) |
| Not done or unknown | 1 (8) | 2 (4) | 0 (0) | 3 (3) |
| Bacteriology, no. (%) | ||||
| Not done | 2 (17) | 17 (31) | 1 (3) | 20 (20) |
| Smear | ||||
| Negative | 10 (100) | 37 (100) | 25 (81) | 72 (92) |
| Positive | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 6 (19) | 6 (8) |
| Culture | ||||
| Negative | 10 (100) | 36 (100) | 16 (52) | 62 (81) |
| Positive | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 15 (48) | 15 (19) |
| Treatment, no. (%) | 10 (83) | 54 (100) | 32 (100) | 96 (98) |
| Median treatment duration (range), months | 3 (1 to 3) | 3 (2 to 6) | 6 (2 to 12) | 3 (1 to 12) |
| Treatment outcome, no. (%) | ||||
| Cure or treatment completed | 7 (70) | 46 (85) | 26 (81) | 79 (82) |
| Treatment stop | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | 1 (1) |
| Loss to follow-up | 3 (30) | 8 (15) | 2 (6) | 13 (14) |
| Transfer or still under treatment | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (9) | 3 (3) |
QF-TB-IT distribution among all groups of patients.
| QF-TB-IT (IU/ml) | ||||
| No* patients | No* missing data | Median (Q1–Q3) | No (%)≥0.35 | |
| Controls | 31 | 1 | 0.02 (0–0.40) | 9 (30%) |
| Healthy contact | 12 | 1 | 0 (0–0.02) | 1 (9%) |
| Latent TB | 54 | 2 | 0.85 (0.06–3.75) | 30 (58%) |
| Active TB | 32 | 0 | 3.28 (0.51–13.97) | 25 (78%) |
(*): number
Figure 1Distribution of QF-TB-IT (in log10) for all groups of patients.
QF-TB-IT values are displayed as a log scale, and null values were arbitrarily set at 0.01 (below the smallest observed non-null value). Box and whiskers plots present the median, first and third quartile of the distribution (box) and outer whiskers extend the whole range of data. QF-TB-IT positivity was defined as values equal or superior to log10 (0.35) which correspond to -0.46 (grey line).
Figure 2ROC curve of QF-TB-IT to predict TB infection in LTBI with known family contact and active TB children.
Figure 3Distribution of QF-TB-IT (in log10) for culture positive and culture negative active TB children (A), for positive and negative chest X-Ray (B) and for known TB family contact (C).
Box and whiskers plots present the median, first and third quartile of the distribution (box) and outer whiskers extend the whole range of data. QF-TB-IT values were displayed on a log scale, and null values were arbitrarily set at 0.01 (below the smallest observed non-null value).
Figure 4Scatter-plot of TST induration diameter (in mm) and QF-TB-IT (in log10) in all patients.
QF-TB-IT values were display on a log scale, and null values were arbitrarily set at 0.01 (below the smallest observed non-null value). TST positivity was defined as values equal or superior to 10 mm (grey line) QF-TB-IT positivity was defined as values equal or superior to log10 (0.35) which correspond to -0.46 (grey line).
Figure 5Distribution of QF-TB-IT (in log10) during follow-up, in Healthy Contacts (HC), Latent TB Infection (LTBI) and Active TB Children.
QF-TB-IT values are displayed on a log scale, and null values were arbitrarily set at 0.01 (below the smallest observed non-null value). QF-TB-IT positivity was defined as values equal or superior to log10 (0.35) which correspond to −0.46 (grey line). LTBI and active TB children presented a significant variation between day 0 and day 10 under treatment (p = 0.035, paired Wilcoxon rank test). In LTBI, QF-TB-IT values were significantly lower at day 90 as compared to day 0 (p = 0.042, paired Wilcoxon rank test). In active TB, QF-TB-IT values were significantly lower at day 180 as compared to day 0 (p = 0.041, paired Wilcoxon rank test).