RATIONALE: Although IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) are widely used to screen for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in high-income countries, published data on repeatability are limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine IGRA repeatability. METHODS: The study population included consecutive patients referred to The Methodist Hospital (Houston, TX) between August 1, 2010 and July 31, 2011 for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection screening with an IGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; Cellestis, Carnegie, Australia). We performed multiple IGRA tests using leftover stimulated plasma according to a prospectively formulated quality control protocol. We analyzed agreement in interpretation of test results classified according to manufacturer-recommended criteria and repeatability of quantitative TB response. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period, 1,086 test results were obtained from 543 subjects. Per the manufacturer's cut-point, the result of the second test was discordant from that of the first in 28 (8%) of 366 patients with valid test results, including 13 with an initial negative result and 15 with an initial positive result. Although agreement between repeat test results was high (κ = 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.90), the normal expected range of within-subject variability in TB response on retesting included differences of ± 0.60 IU/ml for all individuals (coefficient of variation, 14%), and ± 0.24 IU/ml (coefficient of variation, 27%) for individuals whose initial TB response was between 0.25 and 0.80 IU/ml. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability in TB response when IGRAs are repeated using the same patient sample. IGRA results should be interpreted cautiously when TB response is near interpretation cut-points.
RATIONALE: Although IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs) are widely used to screen for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in high-income countries, published data on repeatability are limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine IGRA repeatability. METHODS: The study population included consecutive patients referred to The Methodist Hospital (Houston, TX) between August 1, 2010 and July 31, 2011 for latent tuberculosis (TB) infection screening with an IGRA (QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube; Cellestis, Carnegie, Australia). We performed multiple IGRA tests using leftover stimulated plasma according to a prospectively formulated quality control protocol. We analyzed agreement in interpretation of test results classified according to manufacturer-recommended criteria and repeatability of quantitative TB response. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: During the study period, 1,086 test results were obtained from 543 subjects. Per the manufacturer's cut-point, the result of the second test was discordant from that of the first in 28 (8%) of 366 patients with valid test results, including 13 with an initial negative result and 15 with an initial positive result. Although agreement between repeat test results was high (κ = 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.90), the normal expected range of within-subject variability in TB response on retesting included differences of ± 0.60 IU/ml for all individuals (coefficient of variation, 14%), and ± 0.24 IU/ml (coefficient of variation, 27%) for individuals whose initial TB response was between 0.25 and 0.80 IU/ml. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial variability in TB response when IGRAs are repeated using the same patient sample. IGRA results should be interpreted cautiously when TB response is near interpretation cut-points.
Authors: Shabir Banoo; David Bell; Patrick Bossuyt; Alan Herring; David Mabey; Freddie Poole; Peter G Smith; N Sriram; Chansuda Wongsrichanalai; Ralf Linke; Rick O'Brien; Mark Perkins; Jane Cunningham; Precious Matsoso; Carl Michael Nathanson; Piero Olliaro; Rosanna W Peeling; Andy Ramsay Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Emaeil Porsa; Lee Cheng; Michael M Seale; George L Delclos; Xin Ma; Robert Reich; James M Musser; Edward A Graviss Journal: Clin Vaccine Immunol Date: 2006-01
Authors: Madhukar Pai; Rajnish Joshi; Sandeep Dogra; Deepak K Mendiratta; Pratibha Narang; Shriprakash Kalantri; Arthur L Reingold; John M Colford; Lee W Riley; Dick Menzies Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2006-05-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Madeline L Slater; Gary Welland; Madhukar Pai; Julie Parsonnet; Niaz Banaei Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Elisa Nemes; Virginie Rozot; Hennie Geldenhuys; Nicole Bilek; Simbarashe Mabwe; Deborah Abrahams; Lebohang Makhethe; Mzwandile Erasmus; Alana Keyser; Asma Toefy; Yolundi Cloete; Frances Ratangee; Thomas Blauenfeldt; Morten Ruhwald; Gerhard Walzl; Bronwyn Smith; Andre G Loxton; Willem A Hanekom; Jason R Andrews; Maria D Lempicki; Ruth Ellis; Ann M Ginsberg; Mark Hatherill; Thomas J Scriba Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jason R Andrews; Mark Hatherill; Hassan Mahomed; Willem A Hanekom; Monica Campo; Thomas R Hawn; Robin Wood; Thomas J Scriba Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-03-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Patricio Escalante; Tobias Peikert; Virginia P Van Keulen; Courtney L Erskine; Cathy L Bornhorst; Boleyn R Andrist; Kevin McCoy; Larry R Pease; Roshini S Abraham; Keith L Knutson; Hirohito Kita; Adam G Schrum; Andrew H Limper Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Thara K Venkatappa; Rose Punnoose; Dolly J Katz; Michael P Higgins; Niaz Banaei; Edward A Graviss; Robert W Belknap; Christine S Ho Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2019-10-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Saloua Tagmouti; Madeline Slater; Andrea Benedetti; Sandra V Kik; Niaz Banaei; Adithya Cattamanchi; John Metcalfe; David Dowdy; Richard van Zyl Smit; Nandini Dendukuri; Madhukar Pai; Claudia Denkinger Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2014-10
Authors: Elitza S Theel; Heather Hilgart; Margaret Breen-Lyles; Kevin McCoy; Rhiannon Flury; Laura E Breeher; John Wilson; Irene G Sia; Jennifer A Whitaker; Jeremy Clain; Timothy R Aksamit; Patricio Escalante Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2018-06-25 Impact factor: 5.948