| Literature DB >> 20507549 |
Tom G Connell1, Mary-Ann Davies, Christine Johannisen, Kathryn Wood, Sandy Pienaar, Katalin A Wilkinson, Robert J Wilkinson, Heather J Zar, David Beatty, Mark P Nicol, Nigel Curtis, Brian Eley.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent interest has focused on the potential use of serial interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) release assay (IGRA) measurements to assess the response to anti-tuberculous (TB) treatment. The kinetics of IFN-gamma responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) antigens in HIV-infected children during treatment have not however been previously investigated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20507549 PMCID: PMC2890002 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Demographic details for the patients included in the study (n = 46)
| Median age in months (IQR) | 22.6 (12.4 - 59.6) |
| Male n(%) | 30 (65) |
| Median weight for age score (IQR) | -2.3 (-3.3 - -1.4) |
| BCG scar present n (%) | 33 (72) |
| Localisation of TB | |
| Pulmonary only | 42 (91) |
| Extrapulmonary TB | 1 (2) |
| Disseminated TB | 3 (7) |
| Median TST induration (range) mm | 0 (0 - 11) |
| Median CD4 (IQR) % | 20.2 (12.4 - 28.3) |
| Median absolute CD4 count (IQR) cells/ml | 712 (392 - 1365) |
| On anti-retrovirals at diagnosis n (%) | 10 (22) |
Figure 1Flow chart of recruitment and follow up
IFN- γ ELISpot assay results during anti tuberculous treatment in HIV-infected children
| Antigen | Baseline | 1 month | 2 months | 6 months | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (IQR) IFN-γ response (SFCs/106 PBMC) | 110 (65-305) | 55 (20-267) | 35 (25-95) | 15 (10-115) | p = 0.04† |
| No (%) children with a positive ELISpot result | 15 (100) | 9/13 (69) | 13/15 (87) | 5/11 (45) | p = 0.006ϕ |
| No (%) children with a reduced IFN- γ response compared to baseline | 11/13 (85) | 12/15 (80) | 7/11 (64) | NA | |
| Median (IQR) IFN-γ response (SFCs/106 PBMC) | 177 (48-508) | 185 (15-500) | 40 (27-327) | 20 (5-165) | p = 0.004† |
| No (%) children with a positive ELISpot result | 22 (100) | 13/19 (68) | 17/21 (81) | 8/17 (47) | p = 0.001ϕ |
| No (%) children with a reduced IFN-γ response compared to baseline | 11/19 (55) | 16/21 (76) | 14/17 (82) | NA | |
| Median (IQR) IFN-γ response (highest response to either) | 250 (94-508) | 190 (20-500) | 95 (10-115) | 25 (10-165) | p = 0.004† |
| No (%) children with a positive ELISpot result | 22 (100) | 14/19 (74) | 19/21 (90) | 9/17 (53) | p = 0.002ϕ |
| No (%) children with a reduced IFN-γ response | 14/19 (74) | 16/21 (76) | 14/17 (82) | NA | |
| Median (IQR) IFN-γ response | 155 (82-307) | 185 (27-242) | 177 (55-893) | 515 (45-1010) | p = 0.12† |
| No (%) children with a positive ELISpot result | 14 (100) | 10/13 (77) | 12 (86) | 10/11(91) | p = 0.56ϕ |
| No (%) children with a reduced IFN-γ response compared to baseline | 6/13 (46) | 7/14 (50) | 1/11 (9) | NA | |
* Children with definite TB or probable TB who had a positive IFN-γ ELISpot at presentation
† p value indicates difference in magnitude of the IFN-γ ELISpot responses at baseline vs. 6 months (Mann Whitney U test)
ϕ p value indicates difference in the proportion of children with a positive IFN-γ ELISpot assay (Chi Square test)
Figure 2IFN-γ responses to ESAT-6 (A), CFP-10 (B) and PPD (C) in HIV-infected children in whom the ELISpot was positive at presentation at one, two and six months. P values represent the difference in median IFN-γ responses (indicated by horizontal solid bar) at the different follow up points.
Figure 3IFN-γ responses to ESAT-6 (A) CFP-10 (B) and PPD (C) in children with a initial negative response that became positive at some point during follow up.