Literature DB >> 19122049

What are association formation models?

Anthony Dickinson1.   

Abstract

In his presentation of the propositional account of associative learning, De Houwer (2009) argues that association formation models (AFMs) assume excitatory link representations and automatic learning processes. However, the application of AFMs to human causal and contingency learning has assumed propositional forms of representation, although excitatory link representations are also required to explain certain nonrational consequences of associative learning. Moreover, at least two of the AFMs that have been applied to human associative learning invoke processing with nonautomatic characteristics. In conclusion, the distinction between the propositional account and AFMs of associative learning lies not in the form of representations but in the specific details of the learning processes generating the associative representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19122049     DOI: 10.3758/LB.37.1.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  12 in total

Review 1.  Neuronal coding of prediction errors.

Authors:  W Schultz; A Dickinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Re-examination of the role of within-compound associations in the retrospective revaluation of causal judgements.

Authors:  M R Aitken; M J Larkin; A Dickinson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2001-02

Review 3.  The role of associative history in models of associative learning: a selective review and a hybrid model.

Authors:  M E Le Pelley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol B       Date:  2004-07

4.  Simulations of a modified SOP model applied to retrospective revaluation of human causal learning.

Authors:  Michael R F Aitken; Anthony Dickinson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers.

Authors:  H M Jenkins; B R Moore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  The strength of the orienting response during Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  H Kaye; J M Pearce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1984-01

7.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory.

Authors:  P Waelti; A Dickinson; W Schultz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Causal reasoning in rats.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Kosuke Sawa; Kenneth J Leising; Michael R Waldmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Attention and expectation in human predictive learning: the role of uncertainty.

Authors:  Lee Hogarth; Anthony Dickinson; Alison Austin; Craig Brown; Theodora Duka
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.