Literature DB >> 11452299

Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory.

P Waelti1, A Dickinson, W Schultz.   

Abstract

According to contemporary learning theories, the discrepancy, or error, between the actual and predicted reward determines whether learning occurs when a stimulus is paired with a reward. The role of prediction errors is directly demonstrated by the observation that learning is blocked when the stimulus is paired with a fully predicted reward. By using this blocking procedure, we show that the responses of dopamine neurons to conditioned stimuli was governed differentially by the occurrence of reward prediction errors rather than stimulus-reward associations alone, as was the learning of behavioural reactions. Both behavioural and neuronal learning occurred predominantly when dopamine neurons registered a reward prediction error at the time of the reward. Our data indicate that the use of analytical tests derived from formal behavioural learning theory provides a powerful approach for studying the role of single neurons in learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11452299     DOI: 10.1038/35083500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  312 in total

1.  I(h) channels contribute to the different functional properties of identified dopaminergic subpopulations in the midbrain.

Authors:  Henrike Neuhoff; Axel Neu; Birgit Liss; Jochen Roeper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cocaine can generate a stronger conditioned reinforcer than food despite being a weaker primary reinforcer.

Authors:  Brendan J Tunstall; David N Kearns
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 3.  Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: a critical period of addiction vulnerability.

Authors:  R Andrew Chambers; Jane R Taylor; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 18.112

4.  Olfactory learning in individually assayed Drosophila larvae.

Authors:  Sabine Scherer; Reinhard F Stocker; Bertram Gerber
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 5.  Neurodevelopment, impulsivity, and adolescent gambling.

Authors:  R Andrew Chambers; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2003

6.  Modeling operant behavior in the Parkinsonian rat.

Authors:  Irene Avila; Mark P Reilly; Federico Sanabria; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Claudia L Chavez; Nikhil Banerjee; Peter Killeen; Eddie Castañeda
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  A scale-free systems theory of motivation and addiction.

Authors:  R Andrew Chambers; Warren K Bickel; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 8.  Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders of Basal Ganglia Origin: Restoring Function or Functionality?

Authors:  Thomas Wichmann; Mahlon R DeLong
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.620

9.  Phasic dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens symmetrically encodes a reward prediction error term.

Authors:  Andrew S Hart; Robb B Rutledge; Paul W Glimcher; Paul E M Phillips
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Isomorphisms between psychological processes and neural mechanisms: from stimulus elements to genetic markers of activity.

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Moriel Zelikowsky; Jennifer Perusini; Vanessa Rodriguez Barrera; Sarah Hersman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 2.877

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.