Literature DB >> 19121826

Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex.

Suzanne Dikker1, Hugh Rabagliati, Liina Pylkkänen.   

Abstract

One of the most intriguing findings on language comprehension is that violations of syntactic predictions can affect event-related potentials as early as 120 ms, in the same time-window as early sensory processing. This effect, the so-called early left-anterior negativity (ELAN), has been argued to reflect word category access and initial syntactic structure building (Friederici, 2002). In two experiments, we used magnetoencephalography to investigate whether (a) rapid word category identification relies on overt category-marking closed-class morphemes and (b) whether violations of word category predictions affect modality-specific sensory responses. Participants read sentences containing violations of word category predictions. Unexpected items varied in whether or not their word category was marked by an overt function morpheme. In Experiment 1, the amplitude of the visual evoked M100 component was increased for unexpected items, but only when word category was overtly marked by a function morpheme. Dipole modeling localized the generator of this effect to the occipital cortex. Experiment 2 replicated the main results of Experiment 1 and eliminated two non-morphology-related explanations of the M100 contrast we observed between targets containing overt category-marking and targets that lacked such morphology. Our results show that during reading, syntactically relevant cues in the input can affect activity in occipital regions at around 125 ms, a finding that may shed new light on the remarkable rapidity of language processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19121826      PMCID: PMC2709501          DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  52 in total

1.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients.

Authors:  L Cohen; S Dehaene; L Naccache; S Lehéricy; G Dehaene-Lambertz; M A Hénaff; F Michel
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Saccadic eye movements and cognition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Event-related brain responses to morphological violations in Catalan.

Authors:  A Rodriguez-Fornells; H Clahsen; C Lleó; W Zaake; T F Münte
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2001-03

4.  Segregating early physical and syntactic processes in auditory sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Anja Hahne; Erich Schröger; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Automatic processing of grammar in the human brain as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in English.

Authors:  Joanna Morris; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-22

7.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Neurodynamics of sentence interpretation: ERP evidence from French.

Authors:  Frédéric Isel; Anja Hahne; Burkhard Maess; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 3.251

9.  Speeding up syntax: on the relative timing and automaticity of local phrase structure and morphosyntactic processing as reflected in event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Anna S Hasting; Sonja A Kotz
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.

Authors:  F Tong; K Nakayama; J T Vaughan; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  36 in total

1.  Effects of verbal event structure on online thematic role assignment.

Authors:  Evie Malaia; Ronnie B Wilbur; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2012-10

2.  Processing noncanonical sentences in broca's region: reflections of movement distance and type.

Authors:  Michiru Makuuchi; Yosef Grodzinsky; Katrin Amunts; Andrea Santi; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  To predict or not to predict: age-related differences in the use of sentential context.

Authors:  Edward W Wlotko; Kara D Federmeier; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-07-09

4.  Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening.

Authors:  Jonathan Brennan; Yuval Nir; Uri Hasson; Rafael Malach; David J Heeger; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Never Seem to Find the Time: Evaluating the Physiological Time Course of Visual Word Recognition with Regression Analysis of Single Item ERPs.

Authors:  Sarah Laszlo; Kara D Federmeier
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2014

6.  Dissociable neural imprints of perception and grammar in auditory functional imaging.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Jonas Obleser; Christian Kalberlah; John-Dylan Haynes; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Spatiotemporal Signatures of Lexical-Semantic Prediction.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Kirsten Weber; Alexandre Gramfort; Matti S Hämäläinen; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Multiple Influences of Semantic Memory on Sentence Processing: Distinct Effects of Semantic Relatedness on Violations of Real-World Event/State Knowledge and Animacy Selection Restrictions.

Authors:  Martin Paczynski; Gina R Kuperberg
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Melissa Troyer; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2014-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.