Literature DB >> 18284341

Speeding up syntax: on the relative timing and automaticity of local phrase structure and morphosyntactic processing as reflected in event-related brain potentials.

Anna S Hasting1, Sonja A Kotz.   

Abstract

Neurolinguistic research utilizing event-related brain potentials (ERPs) typically relates syntactic phrase structure processing to an early automatic processing stage around 150 to 200 msec, whereas morphosyntactic processing is associated with a later and somewhat more attention-dependent processing stage between 300 and 500 msec. However, recent studies have challenged this position by reporting highly automatic ERP effects for morphosyntax in the 100 to 200 msec time range. The present study aimed at determining the factors that could contribute to such shifts in latency and automaticity. In two experiments varying the degree of attention, German phrase structure and morphosyntactic violations were compared in conditions in which the locality of the violated syntactic relation, as well as the violation point and the acoustic properties of the speech stimuli, were strictly controlled for. A negativity between 100 and 300 msec after the violation point occurred in response to both types of syntactic violations and independently of the allocation of attentional resources. These findings suggest that the timing and automaticity of ERP effects reflecting specific syntactic subprocesses are influenced to a larger degree by methodological than by linguistic factors, and thus, need to be regarded as relative rather than fixed to temporally successive processing stages.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18284341     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  21 in total

1.  Conditional automaticity in subliminal morphosyntactic priming.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Bert Reynvoet; Jessica Hendler; Lennart Oettl; Stefan Evert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-06-12

2.  Dissociable neural imprints of perception and grammar in auditory functional imaging.

Authors:  Björn Herrmann; Jonas Obleser; Christian Kalberlah; John-Dylan Haynes; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Explicit and implicit second language training differentially affect the achievement of native-like brain activation patterns.

Authors:  Kara Morgan-Short; Karsten Steinhauer; Cristina Sanz; Michael T Ullman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 4.  Understanding in an instant: neurophysiological evidence for mechanistic language circuits in the brain.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov; Olaf Hauk
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Sensitivity to syntax in visual cortex.

Authors:  Suzanne Dikker; Hugh Rabagliati; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-01-03

7.  Putting underspecification in context: ERP evidence for sparse representations in morphophonological alternations.

Authors:  Laurel A Lawyer; David P Corina
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Syntactic learning by mere exposure--an ERP study in adult learners.

Authors:  Jutta L Mueller; Regine Oberecker; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  The Automatic but Flexible and Content-Dependent Nature of Syntax.

Authors:  Laura Jiménez-Ortega; Esperanza Badaya; Pilar Casado; Sabela Fondevila; David Hernández-Gutiérrez; Francisco Muñoz; José Sánchez-García; Manuel Martín-Loeches
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  CNTNAP2 and language processing in healthy individuals as measured with ERPs.

Authors:  Miriam Kos; Danielle van den Brink; Tineke M Snijders; Mark Rijpkema; Barbara Franke; Guillen Fernandez; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.