Literature DB >> 19118723

Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: influence of age, obesity, and left ventricular dysfunction.

Dania Mohty1, Jean G Dumesnil, Najmeddine Echahidi, Patrick Mathieu, François Dagenais, Pierre Voisine, Philippe Pibarot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) on late survival after aortic valve replacement (AVR) and to determine if this effect is modulated by patient age, body mass index (BMI), and pre-operative left ventricular (LV) function.
BACKGROUND: We recently reported that PPM is an independent predictor of operative mortality after AVR, particularly when associated with LV dysfunction.
METHODS: The indexed valve effective orifice area (EOA) was estimated in 2,576 patients having survived AVR and was used to define PPM as not clinically significant if it was >0.85 cm(2)/m(2), as moderate if >0.65 and < or =0.85 cm(2)/m(2), and severe if < or =0.65 cm(2)/m(2).
RESULTS: After adjustment for other risk factors, severe PPM was associated with increased late overall mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.38; p = 0.03) and cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.63; p = 0.0006) in the whole cohort. Severe PPM was also associated with increased overall mortality in patients <70 years old (HR: 1.77; p = 0.002) and in patients with a BMI <30 kg/m(2) (HR: 2.1; p = 0.006), but had no impact in older patients or in obese patients. Moderate PPM was a predictor of mortality in patients with LV ejection fraction <50% (HR: 1.21; p = 0.01), but not in patients with preserved LV function.
CONCLUSIONS: Moderate PPM is associated with increased late mortality in patients with LV dysfunction, but with normal prognosis in those with preserved LV function. Notwithstanding the previously demonstrated deleterious effect of severe PPM on early mortality, this factor appears to increase late mortality only in patients <70 years old and/or with a BMI <30 kg/m(2) or an LV ejection fraction <50%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19118723     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  42 in total

1.  Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Johnston; Edward G Soltesz; Nakul Vakil; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Eric E Roselli; Joseph F Sabik; Nicholas G Smedira; Lars G Svensson; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update.

Authors:  Jean G Dumesnil; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Early and late outcomes of AVR with aortic annular enlargement in octogenarian.

Authors:  Yuki Okamoto; Kazuo Yamamoto; Tsutomu Sugimoto; Shinpei Yoshii
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

4.  Incidence and sequelae of prosthesis-patient mismatch in transcatheter versus surgical valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: a PARTNER trial cohort--a analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Pibarot; Neil J Weissman; William J Stewart; Rebecca T Hahn; Brian R Lindman; Thomas McAndrew; Susheel K Kodali; Michael J Mack; Vinod H Thourani; D Craig Miller; Lars G Svensson; Howard C Herrmann; Craig R Smith; Josep Rodés-Cabau; John Webb; Scott Lim; Ke Xu; Irene Hueter; Pamela S Douglas; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  Narrative review of the contemporary surgical treatment of unicuspid aortic valve disease.

Authors:  Maria von Stumm; Tatjana Sequeira-Gross; Johannes Petersen; Shiho Naito; Lisa Müller; Christoph Sinning; Evaldas Girdauskas
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-04

6.  Mini-aortic valve replacements are not associated with an increased incidence of patient-prosthesis mismatch: a propensity-scored analysis.

Authors:  J Trent Magruder; Joshua C Grimm; Arman Kilic; Todd Crawford; John V Conte; Duke E Cameron; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-12-19

Review 7.  Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Xu Yu Jin; Mario Petrou; Jiang Ting Hu; Ed D Nicol; John R Pepper
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 8.  Update on aortic valve prosthesis-patient mismatch in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Sakamoto; Kazuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-13

Review 9.  Low-gradient aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Marie-Annick Clavel; Julien Magne; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Impact of obesity on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement with a small prosthesis.

Authors:  Biao Wang; Hongyang Yang; Tao Wang; Xiquan Zhang; Wenjie Zhu; Guangqing Cao; Shuming Wu
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.