Literature DB >> 34047933

Challenges and opportunities in improving left ventricular remodelling and clinical outcome following surgical and trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

Xu Yu Jin1,2, Mario Petrou3,4, Jiang Ting Hu5, Ed D Nicol4,6, John R Pepper3,4,7.   

Abstract

Over the last half century, surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has evolved to offer a durable and efficient valve haemodynamically, with low procedural complications that allows favourable remodelling of left ventricular (LV) structure and function. The latter has become more challenging among elderly patients, particularly following trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Precise understanding of myocardial adaptation to pressure and volume overloading and its responses to valve surgery requires comprehensive assessments from aortic valve energy loss, valvular-vascular impedance to myocardial activation, force-velocity relationship, and myocardial strain. LV hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis remains as the structural and morphological focus in this endeavour. Early intervention in asymptomatic aortic stenosis or regurgitation along with individualised management of hypertension and atrial fibrillation is likely to improve patient outcome. Physiological pacing via the His-Purkinje system for conduction abnormalities, further reduction in para-valvular aortic regurgitation along with therapy of angiotensin receptor blockade will improve patient outcome by facilitating hypertrophy regression, LV coordinate contraction, and global vascular function. TAVI leaflet thromboses require anticoagulation while impaired access to coronary ostia risks future TAVI-in-TAVI or coronary interventions. Until comparable long-term durability and the resolution of TAVI related complications become available, SAVR remains the first choice for lower risk younger patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  His-Purkinje pacing; coronary access impairment; left ventricular hypertrophy and fibrosis; myocardial force-velocity relationship; renin-angiotensin system inhibitors; surgical aortic valve replacement; trans-catheter aortic valve implantation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34047933     DOI: 10.1007/s11684-021-0852-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Med        ISSN: 2095-0217            Impact factor:   4.592


  112 in total

1.  Effects of incoordination on left ventricular force-velocity relation in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  X Y Jin; J R Pepper; D G Gibson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Afterload and Fibrosis: Aortic Stenosis Co-Conspirators.

Authors:  Nathaniel Reichek
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-17

3.  Early changes in the time course of myocardial contraction after correcting aortic regurgitation.

Authors:  X Y Jin; J R Pepper; D G Gibson; M H Yacoub
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Relative Contribution of Afterload and Interstitial Fibrosis to Myocardial Function in Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Alisson Slimani; Julie Melchior; Christophe de Meester; Sophie Pierard; Clotilde Roy; Mihaela Amzulescu; Caroline Bouzin; Frédéric Maes; Agnès Pasquet; Anne-Catherine Pouleur; David Vancraeynest; Bernhard Gerber; Gebrine El Khoury; Jean-Louis Vanoverschelde
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-17

5.  Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Incorporation of left ventricular systolic function and stroke volume index.

Authors:  Roosha Parikh; Andrew L Goodman; Tyler Barr; Joseph F Sabik; Lars G Svensson; Luis Leonardo Rodriguez; Bruce W Lytle; Richard A Grimm; Brian P Griffin; Milind Y Desai
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Loss in Life Expectancy After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: SWEDEHEART Study.

Authors:  Natalie Glaser; Michael Persson; Veronica Jackson; Martin J Holzmann; Anders Franco-Cereceda; Ulrik Sartipy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Left Ventricular Contractility and Wall Stress in Patients With Aortic Stenosis With Preserved or Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Saki Ito; Cristina Pislaru; William R Miranda; Vuyisile T Nkomo; Heidi M Connolly; Sorin V Pislaru; Patricia A Pellikka; Bradley R Lewis; Blase A Carabello; Jae K Oh
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-03-13

Review 8.  Diastolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  O M Hess; B Villari; H P Krayenbuehl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Early changes in left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement for isolated aortic stenosis.

Authors:  X Y Jin; J R Pepper; S J Brecker; J A Carey; D G Gibson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1994-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Determinants and prognostic implications of left ventricular mechanical dispersion in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Edgard A Prihadi; E Mara Vollema; Arnold C T Ng; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.