Literature DB >> 15190091

Bayesian integration in force estimation.

Konrad P Körding1, Shih-pi Ku, Daniel M Wolpert.   

Abstract

When we interact with objects in the world, the forces we exert are finely tuned to the dynamics of the situation. As our sensors do not provide perfect knowledge about the environment, a key problem is how to estimate the appropriate forces. Two sources of information can be used to generate such an estimate: sensory inputs about the object and knowledge about previously experienced objects, termed prior information. Bayesian integration defines the way in which these two sources of information should be combined to produce an optimal estimate. To investigate whether subjects use such a strategy in force estimation, we designed a novel sensorimotor estimation task. We controlled the distribution of forces experienced over the course of an experiment thereby defining the prior. We show that subjects integrate sensory information with their prior experience to generate an estimate. Moreover, subjects could learn different prior distributions. These results suggest that the CNS uses Bayesian models when estimating force requirements.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15190091     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00275.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  38 in total

1.  Attention protects the fidelity of visual memory: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Knowing how much you don't know: a neural organization of uncertainty estimates.

Authors:  Dominik R Bach; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Prior experience and current goals affect muscle-spindle and tactile integration.

Authors:  Ely Rabin; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Maintaining rotational equilibrium during object manipulation: linear behavior of a highly non-linear system.

Authors:  Fan Gao; Mark L Latash; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Evidence for stronger visuo-motor than visuo-proprioceptive conflict during mirror drawing performed by a deafferented subject and control subjects.

Authors:  R C Miall; J Cole
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Bayesian and "anti-Bayesian" biases in sensory integration for action and perception in the size-weight illusion.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Flexible Control of Safety Margins for Action Based on Environmental Variability.

Authors:  Alkis M Hadjiosif; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Stochastic modelling of muscle recruitment during activity.

Authors:  Saulo Martelli; Daniela Calvetti; Erkki Somersalo; Marco Viceconti
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  A reduced somatosensory gating response in individuals with multiple sclerosis is related to walking impairment.

Authors:  David J Arpin; James E Gehringer; Tony W Wilson; Max J Kurz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  A recursive Bayesian updating model of haptic stiffness perception.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Roberta L Klatzky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.