Literature DB >> 30485153

Temporal resolution of single-photon responses in primate rod photoreceptors and limits imposed by cellular noise.

Greg D Field1, Valerie Uzzell2, E J Chichilnisky3, Fred Rieke4.   

Abstract

Sensory receptor noise corrupts sensory signals, contributing to imperfect perception and dictating central processing strategies. For example, noise in rod phototransduction limits our ability to detect light, and minimizing the impact of this noise requires precisely tuned nonlinear processing by the retina. But detection sensitivity is only one aspect of night vision: prompt and accurate behavior also requires that rods reliably encode the timing of photon arrivals. We show here that the temporal resolution of responses of primate rods is much finer than the duration of the light response and identify the key limiting sources of transduction noise. We also find that the thermal activation rate of rhodopsin is lower than previous estimates, implying that other noise sources are more important than previously appreciated. A model of rod single-photon responses reveals that the limiting noise relevant for behavior depends critically on how rod signals are pooled by downstream neurons. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Many studies have focused on the visual system's ability to detect photons, but not on its ability to encode the relative timing of detected photons. Timing is essential for computations such as determining the velocity of moving objects. Here we examine the timing precision of primate rod photoreceptor responses and show that it is more precise than previously appreciated. This motivates an evaluation of whether scotopic vision approaches limits imposed by rod temporal resolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  phototransduction; scotopic; signal processing; vision

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30485153      PMCID: PMC6383662          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00683.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  55 in total

1.  Variability in the time course of single photon responses from toad rods: termination of rhodopsin's activity.

Authors:  G G Whitlock; T D Lamb
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Motion perception at scotopic light levels.

Authors:  K R Gegenfurtner; H M Mayser; L T Sharpe
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Responses of retinal rods to single photons.

Authors:  D A Baylor; T D Lamb; K W Yau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Gap-junctional coupling and absolute sensitivity of photoreceptors in macaque retina.

Authors:  Eric P Hornstein; Jan Verweij; Peter H Li; Julie L Schnapf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Electrical properties of the light-sensitive conductance of rods of the salamander Ambystoma tigrinum.

Authors:  D A Baylor; B J Nunn
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Architecture of rod and cone circuits to the on-beta ganglion cell.

Authors:  P Sterling; M A Freed; R G Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Gap-junctional coupling of mammalian rod photoreceptors and its effect on visual detection.

Authors:  Peter H Li; Jan Verweij; James H Long; Julie L Schnapf
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Photovoltage of rods and cones in the macaque retina.

Authors:  D M Schneeweis; J L Schnapf
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-05-19       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Multiplication noise in the human visual system at threshold: 1. Quantum fluctuations and minimum detectable energy.

Authors:  M C Teich; P R Prucnal; G Vannucci; M E Breton; W J McGill
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1982-04

10.  Incorporation of chelator into guinea-pig rods shows that calcium mediates mammalian photoreceptor light adaptation.

Authors:  H R Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  5 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the Rod Photoreceptor Response Depends Critically on the Concentration of the Phosphodiesterase Effector Enzyme.

Authors:  Ala Morshedian; Gabriela Sendek; Sze Yin Ng; Kimberly Boyd; Roxana A Radu; Mingyao Liu; Nikolai O Artemyev; Alapakkam P Sampath; Gordon L Fain
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Analysis of rod/cone gap junctions from the reconstruction of mouse photoreceptor terminals.

Authors:  Munenori Ishibashi; Joyce Keung; Catherine W Morgans; Sue A Aicher; James R Carroll; Joshua H Singer; Li Jia; Wei Li; Iris Fahrenfort; Christophe P Ribelayga; Stephen C Massey
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 8.713

3.  Identification of Multiple Noise Sources Improves Estimation of Neural Responses across Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Alison I Weber; Eric Shea-Brown; Fred Rieke
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-07-06

Review 4.  The cGMP Pathway and Inherited Photoreceptor Degeneration: Targets, Compounds, and Biomarkers.

Authors:  Arianna Tolone; Soumaya Belhadj; Andreas Rentsch; Frank Schwede; François Paquet-Durand
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Properties of multivesicular release from mouse rod photoreceptors support transmission of single-photon responses.

Authors:  Cassandra L Hays; Asia L Sladek; Greg D Field; Wallace B Thoreson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 8.140

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.