J DeVido1, M Jones, M Geraci, N Hollon, R J R Blair, D S Pine, K Blair. 1. Mood and Anxiety Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Generalized social phobia (GSP) involves the fear/avoidance of social situations whereas generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) involves an intrusive worry about everyday life circumstances. It remains unclear whether these, highly co-morbid, conditions represent distinct disorders or alternative presentations of a single underlying pathology. In this study, we examined stimulus-reinforcement-based decision making in GSP and GAD. METHOD: Twenty unmedicated patients with GSP, 16 unmedicated patients with GAD and 19 age-, IQ- and gender-matched healthy comparison (HC) individuals completed the Differential Reward/Punishment Learning Task (DRPLT). In this task, the subject chooses between two objects associated with different levels of reward or punishment. Thus, response choice indexes not only reward/punishment sensitivity but also sensitivity to reward/punishment level according to between-object reinforcement distance. RESULTS: We found that patients with GAD committed a significantly greater number of errors than both the patients with GSP and the HC individuals. By contrast, the patients with GSP and the HC individuals did not differ in performance on this task. CONCLUSIONS: These results link GAD with anomalous non-affective-based decision making. They also indicate that GSP and GAD are associated with distinct pathophysiologies.
BACKGROUND: Generalized social phobia (GSP) involves the fear/avoidance of social situations whereas generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) involves an intrusive worry about everyday life circumstances. It remains unclear whether these, highly co-morbid, conditions represent distinct disorders or alternative presentations of a single underlying pathology. In this study, we examined stimulus-reinforcement-based decision making in GSP and GAD. METHOD: Twenty unmedicated patients with GSP, 16 unmedicated patients with GAD and 19 age-, IQ- and gender-matched healthy comparison (HC) individuals completed the Differential Reward/Punishment Learning Task (DRPLT). In this task, the subject chooses between two objects associated with different levels of reward or punishment. Thus, response choice indexes not only reward/punishment sensitivity but also sensitivity to reward/punishment level according to between-object reinforcement distance. RESULTS: We found that patients with GAD committed a significantly greater number of errors than both the patients with GSP and the HC individuals. By contrast, the patients with GSP and the HC individuals did not differ in performance on this task. CONCLUSIONS: These results link GAD with anomalous non-affective-based decision making. They also indicate that GSP and GAD are associated with distinct pathophysiologies.
Authors: Erin B McClure; Abby Adler; Christopher S Monk; Jennifer Cameron; Samantha Smith; Eric E Nelson; Ellen Leibenluft; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-09-14 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Christopher S Monk; Eric E Nelson; Erin B McClure; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Ellen Leibenluft; R James R Blair; Gang Chen; Dennis S Charney; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Paul J Whalen; Tom Johnstone; Leah H Somerville; Jack B Nitschke; Sara Polis; Andrew L Alexander; Richard J Davidson; Ned H Kalin Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Karina Blair; Jonathan Shaywitz; Bruce W Smith; Rebecca Rhodes; Marilla Geraci; Matthew Jones; Daniel McCaffrey; Meena Vythilingam; Elizabeth Finger; Krystal Mondillo; Madeline Jacobs; Dennis S Charney; R J R Blair; Wayne C Drevets; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Karina Blair; Marilla Geraci; Jeffrey Devido; Daniel McCaffrey; Gang Chen; Meena Vythilingam; Pamela Ng; Nick Hollon; Matthew Jones; R J R Blair; Daniel S Pine Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-10
Authors: Karina S Blair; Marilla Geraci; Bruce W Smith; Nick Hollon; Jeffrey DeVido; Marcela Otero; James R Blair; Daniel S Pine Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Stuart F White; Marilla Geraci; Elizabeth Lewis; Joseph Leshin; Cindy Teng; Bruno Averbeck; Harma Meffert; Monique Ernst; James R Blair; Christian Grillon; Karina S Blair Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: D P Dickstein; E C Finger; M A Brotman; B A Rich; D S Pine; J R Blair; E Leibenluft Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Geoff Rau; Karina S Blair; Lisa Berghorst; Lisa Knopf; Martha Skup; David A Luckenbaugh; Daniel S Pine; Robert J Blair; Ellen Leibenluft Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Cindy Teng; Marcela Otero; Marilla Geraci; R J R Blair; Daniel S Pine; Christian Grillon; Karina S Blair Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 3.222