OBJECTIVE: Deficits in reinforcement-based decision making have been reported in generalized anxiety disorder. However, the pathophysiology of these deficits is largely unknown; published studies have mainly examined adolescents, and the integrity of core functional processes underpinning decision making remains undetermined. In particular, it is unclear whether the representation of reinforcement prediction error (PE) (the difference between received and expected reinforcement) is disrupted in generalized anxiety disorder. This study addresses these issues in adults with the disorder. METHOD: Forty-six unmedicated individuals with generalized anxiety disorder and 32 healthy comparison subjects group-matched on IQ, gender, and age performed a passive avoidance task while undergoing functional MRI. Data analyses were performed using a computational modeling approach. RESULTS: Behaviorally, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder showed impaired reinforcement-based decision making. Imaging results revealed that during feedback, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder relative to healthy subjects showed a reduced correlation between PE and activity within the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, and other structures implicated in decision making. In addition, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder relative to healthy participants showed a reduced correlation between punishment PEs, but not reward PEs, and activity within the left and right lentiform nucleus/putamen. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify computational impairments during decision making in generalized anxiety disorder. PE signaling is significantly disrupted in individuals with the disorder and may lead to their decision-making deficits and excessive worry about everyday problems by disrupting the online updating ("reality check") of the current relationship between the expected values of current response options and the actual received rewards and punishments.
OBJECTIVE: Deficits in reinforcement-based decision making have been reported in generalized anxiety disorder. However, the pathophysiology of these deficits is largely unknown; published studies have mainly examined adolescents, and the integrity of core functional processes underpinning decision making remains undetermined. In particular, it is unclear whether the representation of reinforcement prediction error (PE) (the difference between received and expected reinforcement) is disrupted in generalized anxiety disorder. This study addresses these issues in adults with the disorder. METHOD: Forty-six unmedicated individuals with generalized anxiety disorder and 32 healthy comparison subjects group-matched on IQ, gender, and age performed a passive avoidance task while undergoing functional MRI. Data analyses were performed using a computational modeling approach. RESULTS: Behaviorally, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder showed impaired reinforcement-based decision making. Imaging results revealed that during feedback, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder relative to healthy subjects showed a reduced correlation between PE and activity within the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, and other structures implicated in decision making. In addition, individuals with generalized anxiety disorder relative to healthy participants showed a reduced correlation between punishment PEs, but not reward PEs, and activity within the left and right lentiform nucleus/putamen. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to identify computational impairments during decision making in generalized anxiety disorder. PE signaling is significantly disrupted in individuals with the disorder and may lead to their decision-making deficits and excessive worry about everyday problems by disrupting the online updating ("reality check") of the current relationship between the expected values of current response options and the actual received rewards and punishments.
Authors: Karina S Blair; Marilla Geraci; Bruce W Smith; Nick Hollon; Jeffrey DeVido; Marcela Otero; James R Blair; Daniel S Pine Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Brenda E Benson; Amanda E Guyer; Eric E Nelson; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Xun Liu; David K Powell; Hongbin Wang; Brian T Gold; Christine R Corbly; Jane E Joseph Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2007-04-25 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Zachary B Millman; Keith Gallagher; Caroline Demro; Jason Schiffman; Gloria M Reeves; James M Gold; Pamela J Rakhshan Rouhakhtar; John Fitzgerald; Nicole D Andorko; Samantha Redman; Robert W Buchanan; Laura M Rowland; James A Waltz Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2019-04-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Stuart F White; Patrick Tyler; Mary L Botkin; Anna K Erway; Laura C Thornton; Venkata Kolli; Kayla Pope; Harma Meffert; R James Blair Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.376
Authors: Ru Zhang; Joseph Aloi; Sahil Bajaj; Johannah Bashford-Largo; Jennie Lukoff; Amanda Schwartz; Jamie Elowsky; Matthew Dobbertin; Karina S Blair; R James R Blair Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Hanna Keren; Gang Chen; Brenda Benson; Monique Ernst; Ellen Leibenluft; Nathan A Fox; Daniel S Pine; Argyris Stringaris Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-05-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Kristen L Eckstrand; Lindsay C Hanford; Michele A Bertocci; Henry W Chase; Tsafrir Greenberg; Jeanette Lockovich; Ricki Stiffler; Haris A Aslam; Simona Graur; Genna Bebko; Erika E Forbes; Mary L Phillips Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Kristen L Eckstrand; Erika E Forbes; Michele A Bertocci; Henry W Chase; Tsafrir Greenberg; Jeanette Lockovich; Ricki Stiffler; Haris A Aslam; Simona Graur; Genna Bebko; Mary L Phillips Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 13.382