OBJECTIVE: Generalized social phobia involves fear/avoidance, specifically of social situations, whereas generalized anxiety disorder involves intrusive worry about diverse circumstances. It remains unclear the degree to which these two, often comorbid, conditions represent distinct disorders or alternative presentations of a single, core underlying pathology. Functional magnetic resonance imaging assessed the neural response to facial expressions in generalized social phobia and generalized anxiety disorder. METHOD: Individuals matched on age, IQ, and gender with generalized social phobia without generalized anxiety disorder (N=17), generalized anxiety disorder (N=17), or no psychopathology (N=17) viewed neutral, fearful, and angry expressions while ostensibly making a simple gender judgment. RESULTS: The patients with generalized social phobia without generalized anxiety disorder showed increased activation to fearful relative to neutral expressions in several regions, including the amygdala, compared to healthy individuals. This increased amygdala response related to self-reported anxiety in patients with generalized social phobia without generalized anxiety disorder. In contrast, patients with generalized anxiety disorder showed significantly less activation to fearful relative to neutral faces compared to the healthy individuals. They did show significantly increased response to angry expressions relative to healthy individuals in a lateral region of the middle frontal gyrus. This increased lateral frontal response related to self-reported anxiety in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neural circuitry dysfunctions differ in generalized social phobia and generalized anxiety disorder.
OBJECTIVE: Generalized social phobia involves fear/avoidance, specifically of social situations, whereas generalized anxiety disorder involves intrusive worry about diverse circumstances. It remains unclear the degree to which these two, often comorbid, conditions represent distinct disorders or alternative presentations of a single, core underlying pathology. Functional magnetic resonance imaging assessed the neural response to facial expressions in generalized social phobia and generalized anxiety disorder. METHOD: Individuals matched on age, IQ, and gender with generalized social phobia without generalized anxiety disorder (N=17), generalized anxiety disorder (N=17), or no psychopathology (N=17) viewed neutral, fearful, and angry expressions while ostensibly making a simple gender judgment. RESULTS: The patients with generalized social phobia without generalized anxiety disorder showed increased activation to fearful relative to neutral expressions in several regions, including the amygdala, compared to healthy individuals. This increased amygdala response related to self-reported anxiety in patients with generalized social phobia without generalized anxiety disorder. In contrast, patients with generalized anxiety disorder showed significantly less activation to fearful relative to neutral faces compared to the healthy individuals. They did show significantly increased response to angry expressions relative to healthy individuals in a lateral region of the middle frontal gyrus. This increased lateral frontal response related to self-reported anxiety in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neural circuitry dysfunctions differ in generalized social phobia and generalized anxiety disorder.
Authors: Christopher S Monk; Eva H Telzer; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Xiaoqin Mai; Hugo M C Louro; Gang Chen; Erin B McClure-Tone; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-05
Authors: Carlos Blanco; Franklin R Schneier; Andrew Schmidt; Carmen-Rosa Blanco-Jerez; Randall D Marshall; Arturo Sánchez-Lacay; Michael R Liebowitz Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2003 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Karina S Blair; Marilla Geraci; Katherine Korelitz; Marcela Otero; Ken Towbin; Monique Ernst; Ellen Leibenluft; R J R Blair; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Tristen K Inagaki; Keely A Muscatell; Michael R Irwin; Steve W Cole; Naomi I Eisenberger Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: C M Sylvester; M Corbetta; M E Raichle; T L Rodebaugh; B L Schlaggar; Y I Sheline; C F Zorumski; E J Lenze Journal: Trends Neurosci Date: 2012-06-02 Impact factor: 13.837
Authors: Karina S Blair; Marilla Geraci; Bruce W Smith; Nick Hollon; Jeffrey DeVido; Marcela Otero; James R Blair; Daniel S Pine Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Brian R Cornwell; Randi Heller; Arter Biggs; Daniel S Pine; Christian Grillon Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2010-10-05 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Lisa J Burklund; Michelle G Craske; Shelley E Taylor; Matthew D Lieberman Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2014-05-08 Impact factor: 3.436
Authors: Oliver J Robinson; Cassie Overstreet; Philip S Allen; Alison Letkiewicz; Katherine Vytal; Daniel S Pine; Christian Grillon Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-04-11 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Emily K Leiker; Harma Meffert; Laura C Thornton; Brittany K Taylor; Joseph Aloi; Heba Abdel-Rahim; Niraj Shah; Patrick M Tyler; Stuart F White; Karina S Blair; Francesca Filbey; Kayla Pope; Matthew Dobbertin; R James R Blair Journal: Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 2.376