BACKGROUND: Generalized social phobia (GSP) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are both associated with emotion dysregulation. Research implicates dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in both explicit emotion regulation (EER) and top-down attentional control (TAC). Although studies have examined these processes in GSP or GAD, no work compares findings across the two disorders or examines functioning in cases comorbid for both disorders (GSP/GAD). Here we compare the neural correlates of EER and TAC in GSP, GAD, and GSP/GAD. METHODS: Medication-free adults with GSP (EER n = 19; TAC n = 18), GAD (EER n = 17; TAC n = 17), GSP/GAD (EER n = 17; TAC n = 15), and no psychopathology (EER n = 18; TAC n = 18) participated. During EER, individuals alternatively viewed and upregulated and downregulated responses to emotional pictures. During TAC, they performed an emotional Stroop task. RESULTS: For both tasks, significant group × condition interactions emerged in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and parietal cortices. Healthy adults showed significantly increased recruitment during emotion regulation, relative to emotion-picture viewing. GAD, GSP, and GSP/GAD subjects showed no such increases, with all groups differing from healthy adults but not from each other. Evidence of emotion-related disorder-specificity emerged in medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala. This disorder-specific responding varied as a function of emotion content but not emotion-regulatory demands. CONCLUSIONS: GSP and GAD both involve reduced capacity for engaging emotion-regulation brain networks, whether explicitly or via TAC. A reduced ability to recruit regions implicated in top-down attention might represent a general risk factor for anxiety disorders.
BACKGROUND: Generalized social phobia (GSP) and generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) are both associated with emotion dysregulation. Research implicates dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in both explicit emotion regulation (EER) and top-down attentional control (TAC). Although studies have examined these processes in GSP or GAD, no work compares findings across the two disorders or examines functioning in cases comorbid for both disorders (GSP/GAD). Here we compare the neural correlates of EER and TAC in GSP, GAD, and GSP/GAD. METHODS: Medication-free adults with GSP (EER n = 19; TAC n = 18), GAD (EER n = 17; TAC n = 17), GSP/GAD (EER n = 17; TAC n = 15), and no psychopathology (EER n = 18; TAC n = 18) participated. During EER, individuals alternatively viewed and upregulated and downregulated responses to emotional pictures. During TAC, they performed an emotional Stroop task. RESULTS: For both tasks, significant group × condition interactions emerged in dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and parietal cortices. Healthy adults showed significantly increased recruitment during emotion regulation, relative to emotion-picture viewing. GAD, GSP, and GSP/GAD subjects showed no such increases, with all groups differing from healthy adults but not from each other. Evidence of emotion-related disorder-specificity emerged in medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala. This disorder-specific responding varied as a function of emotion content but not emotion-regulatory demands. CONCLUSIONS:GSP and GAD both involve reduced capacity for engaging emotion-regulation brain networks, whether explicitly or via TAC. A reduced ability to recruit regions implicated in top-down attention might represent a general risk factor for anxiety disorders.
Authors: K S Blair; B W Smith; D G V Mitchell; J Morton; M Vythilingam; L Pessoa; D Fridberg; A Zametkin; D Sturman; E E Nelson; W C Drevets; D S Pine; A Martin; R J R Blair Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-01-18 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Amanda E Guyer; Jennifer Y F Lau; Erin B McClure-Tone; Jessica Parrish; Nina D Shiffrin; Richard C Reynolds; Gang Chen; R J R Blair; Ellen Leibenluft; Nathan A Fox; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine; Eric E Nelson Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-11
Authors: Karina Blair; Jonathan Shaywitz; Bruce W Smith; Rebecca Rhodes; Marilla Geraci; Matthew Jones; Daniel McCaffrey; Meena Vythilingam; Elizabeth Finger; Krystal Mondillo; Madeline Jacobs; Dennis S Charney; R J R Blair; Wayne C Drevets; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-05-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Marie T Banich; Kristen L Mackiewicz; Brendan E Depue; Anson J Whitmer; Gregory A Miller; Wendy Heller Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Jack B Nitschke; Issidoros Sarinopoulos; Desmond J Oathes; Tom Johnstone; Paul J Whalen; Richard J Davidson; Ned H Kalin Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-01-02 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Karina Blair; Marilla Geraci; Jeffrey Devido; Daniel McCaffrey; Gang Chen; Meena Vythilingam; Pamela Ng; Nick Hollon; Matthew Jones; R J R Blair; Daniel S Pine Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2008-10
Authors: Stuart F White; Marilla Geraci; Elizabeth Lewis; Joseph Leshin; Cindy Teng; Bruno Averbeck; Harma Meffert; Monique Ernst; James R Blair; Christian Grillon; Karina S Blair Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2016-09-15 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Susan W White; Carla A Mazefsky; Gabriel S Dichter; Pearl H Chiu; John A Richey; Thomas H Ollendick Journal: Int J Dev Neurosci Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 2.457
Authors: Michael Gaebler; Judith K Daniels; Jan-Peter Lamke; Thomas Fydrich; Henrik Walter Journal: J Psychiatry Neurosci Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 6.186