CONTEXT: Generalized social phobia (GSP) is characterized by fear/avoidance of social situations. Previous studies have examined the neural responses in GSP to one class of social stimuli, facial expressions. However, studies have not examined the neural response in GSP to another equally important class of social stimuli, the communication of praise or criticism. OBJECTIVE: To examine the neural response to receipt of praise or criticism in GSP; specifically, to determine whether patients with GSP show an increased response to the receipt of both praise and criticism and whether self-relevance modulates this relationship. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Government clinical research institute. PARTICIPANTS: Unmedicated individuals with GSP (n = 17) and age-, IQ-, and sex-matched healthy comparison individuals (n = 17). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Blood oxygenation level-dependent signal, as measured via functional magnetic resonance imaging. During functional magnetic resonance imaging scans, individuals read positive (eg, You are beautiful), negative (eg, You are ugly), and neutral (eg, You are human) comments that could be either about the self or about somebody else (eg, He is beautiful). RESULTS: Hypothesized significant group x valence x referent interactions were observed within regions of the medial prefrontal cortex and bilateral amygdala. In these regions, the patients with GSP showed significantly increased blood oxygenation level-dependent responses, relative to comparison individuals, to negative comments (criticism) referring to themselves. However, in contrast, there were no significant group differences with respect to negative comments referring to others or neutral or positive comments referring to self or others. CONCLUSIONS: These results implicate the medial prefrontal cortex, involved in the representation of the self, together with the amygdala, in the pathophysiology of GSP. Further, findings demonstrate a meaningful effect of psychological context on neural-circuitry hyperactivity in GSP.
CONTEXT: Generalized social phobia (GSP) is characterized by fear/avoidance of social situations. Previous studies have examined the neural responses in GSP to one class of social stimuli, facial expressions. However, studies have not examined the neural response in GSP to another equally important class of social stimuli, the communication of praise or criticism. OBJECTIVE: To examine the neural response to receipt of praise or criticism in GSP; specifically, to determine whether patients with GSP show an increased response to the receipt of both praise and criticism and whether self-relevance modulates this relationship. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Government clinical research institute. PARTICIPANTS: Unmedicated individuals with GSP (n = 17) and age-, IQ-, and sex-matched healthy comparison individuals (n = 17). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Blood oxygenation level-dependent signal, as measured via functional magnetic resonance imaging. During functional magnetic resonance imaging scans, individuals read positive (eg, You are beautiful), negative (eg, You are ugly), and neutral (eg, You are human) comments that could be either about the self or about somebody else (eg, He is beautiful). RESULTS: Hypothesized significant group x valence x referent interactions were observed within regions of the medial prefrontal cortex and bilateral amygdala. In these regions, the patients with GSP showed significantly increased blood oxygenation level-dependent responses, relative to comparison individuals, to negative comments (criticism) referring to themselves. However, in contrast, there were no significant group differences with respect to negative comments referring to others or neutral or positive comments referring to self or others. CONCLUSIONS: These results implicate the medial prefrontal cortex, involved in the representation of the self, together with the amygdala, in the pathophysiology of GSP. Further, findings demonstrate a meaningful effect of psychological context on neural-circuitry hyperactivity in GSP.
Authors: Sterling C Johnson; Leslie C Baxter; Lana S Wilder; James G Pipe; Joseph E Heiserman; George P Prigatano Journal: Brain Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Karina S Blair; Marilla Geraci; Katherine Korelitz; Marcela Otero; Ken Towbin; Monique Ernst; Ellen Leibenluft; R J R Blair; Daniel S Pine Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Erin B McClure-Tone; Norberto E Nawa; Eric E Nelson; Allison M Detloff; Stephen J Fromm; Daniel S Pine; Monique Ernst Journal: Dev Neuropsychol Date: 2011 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Karina S Blair; Marilla Geraci; Bruce W Smith; Nick Hollon; Jeffrey DeVido; Marcela Otero; James R Blair; Daniel S Pine Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-15 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Andrea L Gold; Tomer Shechner; Madeline J Farber; Carolyn N Spiro; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine; Jennifer C Britton Journal: Depress Anxiety Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 6.505
Authors: Dave J Hayes; Niall W Duncan; Christine Wiebking; Karin Pietruska; Pengmin Qin; Stefan Lang; Jean Gagnon; Paul Gravel Bing; Jeroen Verhaeghe; Alexey P Kostikov; Ralf Schirrmacher; Andrew J Reader; Julien Doyon; Pierre Rainville; Georg Northoff Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Carina Y Heitmann; Jutta Peterburs; Martin Mothes-Lasch; Marlit C Hallfarth; Stephanie Böhme; Wolfgang H R Miltner; Thomas Straube Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Gregory A Fonzo; Taru M Flagan; Sarah Sullivan; Carolyn B Allard; Erin M Grimes; Alan N Simmons; Martin P Paulus; Murray B Stein Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2012-11-13 Impact factor: 3.222