Literature DB >> 19099305

Initial experience with custom-fit total knee replacement: intra-operative events and long-leg coronal alignment.

Brian A Spencer1, Michael A Mont, Mike S McGrath, Bradley Boyd, Michael F Mitrick.   

Abstract

New technology using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows the surgeon to place total knee replacement components into each patient's pre-arthritic natural alignment. This study evaluated the initial intra-operative experience using this technique. Twenty-one patients had a sagittal MRI of their arthritic knee to determine component placement for a total knee replacement. Cutting guides were machined to control all intra-operative cuts. Intra-operative events were recorded and these knees were compared to a matching cohort of the senior surgeon's previous 30 conventional total knee replacements. Post-operative scanograms were obtained from each patient and coronal alignment was compared to previous studies using conventional and computer-assisted techniques. There were no intra-operative or acute post-operative complications. There were no differences in blood loss and there was a mean decrease in operative time of 14% compared to a cohort of patients with conventional knee replacements. The average deviation from the mechanical axis was 1.2 degrees of varus, which was comparable to previously reported conventional and computer-assisted techniques. Custom-fit total knee replacement appeared to be a safe procedure for uncomplicated cases of osteoarthritis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19099305      PMCID: PMC2899191          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-008-0693-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  10 in total

1.  Three-dimensional morphology of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality.

Authors:  D G Eckhoff; T F Dwyer; J M Bach; V M Spitzer; K D Reinig
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Three-dimensional morphology and kinematics of the distal part of the femur viewed in virtual reality. Part II.

Authors:  Donald G Eckhoff; Joel M Bach; Victor M Spitzer; Karl D Reinig; Michelle M Bagur; Todd H Baldini; David Rubinstein; Stephen Humphries
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Tibial axis and patellar position relative to the femoral epicondylar axis during squatting.

Authors:  Kathryn M Coughlin; Stephen J Incavo; David L Churchill; Bruce D Beynnon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality.

Authors:  Donald G Eckhoff; Joel M Bach; Victor M Spitzer; Karl D Reinig; Michelle M Bagur; Todd H Baldini; Nicolas M P Flannery
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study.

Authors:  S David Stulberg; Mark A Yaffe; Samuel S Koo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment.

Authors:  Brian A Klatt; Nitin Goyal; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Coronal alignment after total knee replacement.

Authors:  R S Jeffery; R W Morris; R A Denham
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-09

8.  A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Doerte Krocker; Ulrike Weiss; Stephan Tohtz; Carsten Perka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Posterior tilting of the tibial component decreases femoral rollback in posterior-substituting knee replacement: a computer simulation study.

Authors:  S J Piazza; S L Delp; S D Stulberg; S H Stern
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years.

Authors:  J M Spencer; S K Chauhan; K Sloan; A Taylor; R J Beaver
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-04
  10 in total
  50 in total

1.  Assessing the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jong-Keun Seon; Hyeong-Won Park; Seung-Hyun Yoo; Eun-Kyoo Song
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Increased flexion position of the femoral component reduces the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Robert Hube; Carsten Perka; Doerte Matziolis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The reversed gap technique produces anatomical alignment with less midflexion instability in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Georg Matziolis; Steffen Brodt; Christoph Windisch; Eric Roehner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Mark Yaffe; Michael Luo; Nitin Goyal; Philip Chan; Anay Patel; Max Cayo; S David Stulberg
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  No difference in mechanical alignment and femoral component placement between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Huichao Fu; Jiaxing Wang; Shenyuan Zhou; Tao Cheng; Wen Zhang; Qi Wang; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Accuracy of Individualized Custom Tibial Cutting Guides in UKA.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Joseph D Lipman; Carl W Imhauser; Scott M Tucker; Yogesh Rajak; Geoffrey H Westrich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-09-09

7.  Evaluation of the accuracy of resected bone thickness based on patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazumasa Yamamura; Fumiaki Inori; Sadahiko Konishi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Best one hundred papers of International Orthopaedics: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Georgios N Panagopoulos; Cyril Mauffrey; Andrew Quaile; Marius M Scarlat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty does not match the pre-operative plan as assessed by intra-operative computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Corey Scholes; Varun Sahni; Sebastien Lustig; David A Parker; Myles R J Coolican
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jan Victor; Jan Dujardin; Hilde Vandenneucker; Nele Arnout; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.