Literature DB >> 19096843

Mean and maximum standardized uptake values in [18F]FDG-PET for assessment of histopathological response in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma after radiochemotherapy.

Matthias Schmidt1, Elfriede Bollschweiler, Markus Dietlein, Stefan P Mönig, Carsten Kobe, Daniel Vallböhmer, Daniel Vallboehmer, Wolfgang Eschner, Arnulf Hölscher, Harald Schicha.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the potential of [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for the assessment of histopathological response and survival after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 2005 and 2006, 55 patients (43 men, 12 women; median age 60 years) with locally advanced oesophageal cancer (cT3-4 Nx M0; 24 with squamous cell carcinoma, 31 with adenocarcinoma) underwent transthoracic en bloc oesophagectomy after completion of treatment with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy ad 36 Gy in a prospective clinical trial. Of the 55 patients, 21 (38%) were classified as histopathological responders (<10% vital residual tumour cells) and 34 (62%) as nonresponders. FDG-PET was performed before (PET 1) and 3-4 weeks after the end (PET 2) of radiochemotherapy with assessment of maximum and average standardized uptake values (SUV) for correlation with histopathological response and survival.
RESULTS: Histopathological responders had a slightly higher baseline SUV than nonresponders (p<0.0001 between PET 1 and PET 2 for responders and nonresponders) and the decrease was more prominent in responders. Except for SUVmax in patients with squamous cell carcinoma neither baseline nor preoperative SUV nor percent SUV reduction correlated significantly with histopathological response. Histopathological responders had a 2-year overall survival of 91 +/- 9% and nonresponders a survival of 53 +/- 10% (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Our study does not support recent reports that FDG-PET predicts histopathological response and survival in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer treated by neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19096843     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-1011-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  46 in total

1.  Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value.

Authors:  S C Huang
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.408

2.  Induction chemotherapy in Barrett cancer: influence on surgical risk and outcome.

Authors:  Joerg R Siewert; Florian Lordick; Katja Ott; Hubert J Stein; Wolfgang A Weber; Karen Becker; Christian Peschel; Ulrich Fink; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Quantitating tumor glucose metabolism with FDG and PET.

Authors:  R A Hawkins; Y Choi; S C Huang; C Messa; C K Hoh; M E Phelps
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Preoperative risk analysis--a reliable predictor of postoperative outcome after transthoracic esophagectomy?

Authors:  W Schröder; E Bollschweiler; C Kossow; A H Hölscher
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection.

Authors:  B P Whooley; S Law; S C Murthy; A Alexandrou; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification.

Authors:  Paul M Schneider; Stephan E Baldus; Ralf Metzger; Martin Kocher; Rudolf Bongartz; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Hartmut Schaefer; Juergen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Rolf P Mueller; Arnulf H Hoelscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Comparison of different SUV-based methods for monitoring cytotoxic therapy with FDG PET.

Authors:  A Stahl; K Ott; M Schwaiger; W A Weber
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  In vitro assessment of 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, L-methionine and thymidine as agents to monitor the early response of a human adenocarcinoma cell line to radiotherapy.

Authors:  K Higashi; A C Clavo; R L Wahl
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Benefits and limitations of Kaplan-Meier calculations of survival chance in cancer surgery.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-08-14       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  11 in total

1.  Value of sequential 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in prediction of the overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yimin Li; Qin Lin; Zuoming Luo; Long Zhao; Luchao Zhu; Long Sun; Hua Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

Authors:  Arta Monir Monjazeb; Greg Riedlinger; Mebea Aklilu; Kim R Geisinger; Girish Mishra; Scott Isom; Paige Clark; Edward A Levine; A William Blackstock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher; Matthias Schmidt; Ute Warnecke-Eberz
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 4.  [Importance of PET in surgery of esophageal cancer].

Authors:  K Ott; T Schmidt; F Lordick; K Herrmann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography immediately after chemoradiotherapy predicts prognosis in patients with locoregional postoperative recurrent esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Keiichi Jingu; Tomohiro Kaneta; Kenji Nemoto; Ken Takeda; Yoshihiro Ogawa; Hisanori Ariga; Masashi Koto; Toru Sakayauchi; Yoshihiro Takai; Shoki Takahashi; Shogo Yamada
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  PET-CT for radiotherapy treatment planning and response monitoring in solid tumors.

Authors:  Johan Bussink; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Winette T A van der Graaf; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Pathologic Complete Response Is an Independent Predictor of Improved Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Raed M Alnaji; William Du; Emmanuel Gabriel; Smit Singla; Kristopher Attwood; Hector Nava; Usha Malhotra; Steven N Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Does the value of PET-CT extend beyond pretreatment staging? An analysis of survival in surgical patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Boris Sepesi; Daniel P Raymond; Marek Polomsky; Thomas J Watson; Virginia R Litle; Carolyn E Jones; Rui Hu; Xing Qiu; Jeffrey H Peters
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  FDG-PET parameters as prognostic factor in esophageal cancer patients: a review.

Authors:  J M T Omloo; M van Heijl; O S Hoekstra; M I van Berge Henegouwen; J J B van Lanschot; G W Sloof
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  A partial volume effect correction tailored for 18F-FDG-PET oncological studies.

Authors:  F Gallivanone; C Canevari; L Gianolli; C Salvatore; P A Della Rosa; M C Gilardi; I Castiglioni
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.