Literature DB >> 21263464

PET-CT for radiotherapy treatment planning and response monitoring in solid tumors.

Johan Bussink1, Johannes H A M Kaanders, Winette T A van der Graaf, Wim J G Oyen.   

Abstract

PET imaging has evolved as an indispensible tool for staging in oncology. Multiple quantitative measurements can be performed, enabling the effects of treatment to be monitored before changes are detectable with the use of conventional imaging modalities. PET tracers are available to visualize and quantify the most important mechanisms of resistance to radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. Reproducibility of these tracers depends on the particular tracer and the underlying biology of the process that is being investigated. PET enables clinicians to select patients for intensified treatment on the basis of resistance mechanisms taking place at the molecular level. From translational studies and randomized trials, it has become clear that appropriate patient selection can prevent unnecessary rejection of various treatment options through the observation of individual patients rather than only looking at the results of a large study population.
© 2011 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21263464     DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1759-4774            Impact factor:   66.675


  100 in total

1.  On respiratory impairment in cancer cells.

Authors:  O WARBURG
Journal:  Science       Date:  1956-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer: the prognostic impact of neoangiogenesis and the cytokines VEGF and bFGF in tumours and blood.

Authors:  Roy M Bremnes; Carlos Camps; Rafael Sirera
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 5.705

3.  Evidence for acutely hypoxic cells in mouse tumours, and a possible mechanism of reoxygenation.

Authors:  J M Brown
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Targeting nonhomologous end-joining through epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition: rationale and strategies for radiosensitization.

Authors:  Bipasha Mukherjee; Hak Choy; Chaitanya Nirodi; Sandeep Burma
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 5.  Prognostic factors in breast cancer. College of American Pathologists Consensus Statement 1999.

Authors:  P L Fitzgibbons; D L Page; D Weaver; A D Thor; D C Allred; G M Clark; S G Ruby; F O'Malley; J F Simpson; J L Connolly; D F Hayes; S B Edge; A Lichter; S J Schnitt
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Is (18)F-FDG a surrogate tracer to measure tumor hypoxia? Comparison with the hypoxic tracer (14)C-EF3 in animal tumor models.

Authors:  Nicolas Christian; Stéphanie Deheneffe; Anne Bol; Marc De Bast; Daniel Labar; John A Lee; Vincent Grégoire
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Decreased repopulation as well as increased reoxygenation contribute to the improvement in local control after targeting of the EGFR by C225 during fractionated irradiation.

Authors:  Mechthild Krause; Gernot Ostermann; Cordula Petersen; Ala Yaromina; Franziska Hessel; Andreas Harstrick; Albert J van der Kogel; Howard D Thames; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  18FDG-PET based radiation planning of mediastinal lymph nodes in limited disease small cell lung cancer changes radiotherapy fields: a planning study.

Authors:  Judith van Loon; Claudia Offermann; Geert Bosmans; Rinus Wanders; André Dekker; Jacques Borger; Michel Oellers; Anne-Marie Dingemans; Angela van Baardwijk; Jaap Teule; Gabriel Snoep; Monique Hochstenbag; Ruud Houben; Philippe Lambin; Dirk De Ruysscher
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Reproducibility of quantitative 18F-3'-deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine measurements using positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Adrianus J de Langen; Bianca Klabbers; Mark Lubberink; Ronald Boellaard; Marieke D Spreeuwenberg; Ben J Slotman; Remco de Bree; Egbert F Smit; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  A marker for hypoxic cells in tumours with potential clinical applicability.

Authors:  J D Chapman; A J Franko; J Sharplin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  28 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Hedvig Hricak; Steven M Larson
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Value of sequential 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) in prediction of the overall survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yimin Li; Qin Lin; Zuoming Luo; Long Zhao; Luchao Zhu; Long Sun; Hua Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

Review 3.  The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammaroto; Natale Quartuccio; Alessandro Sindoni; Francesca Di Mauro; Federico Caobelli
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology--multifactorial decision support systems.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Maud H W Starmans; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Georgi Nalbantov; Hugo J W L Aerts; Erik Roelofs; Wouter van Elmpt; Paul C Boutros; Pierluigi Granone; Vincenzo Valentini; Adrian C Begg; Dirk De Ruysscher; Andre Dekker
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Individualization of cancer treatment from radiotherapy perspective.

Authors:  Ala Yaromina; Mechthild Krause; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 6.603

6.  An alternative parameter for early forecasting clinical response in NSCLC patients during radiotherapy: proof of concept study.

Authors:  Laetitia Padovani; Aurelie Baret; Joseph Ciccolini; David Taieb; Farman Bardia; Laetitia Teissonnier; Xavier Muracciole; Fabrice Barlesi; Dominique Barbolosi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 7.  HPV, hypoxia and radiation response in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Eva-Leonne Göttgens; Christian Ostheimer; Paul N Span; Jan Bussink; Ester M Hammond
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  An alternative approach to histopathological validation of PET imaging for radiation therapy image-guidance: a proof of concept.

Authors:  Marian Axente; Jun He; Christopher P Bass; Gobalakrishnan Sundaresan; Jamal Zweit; Jeffrey F Williamson; Andrei Pugachev
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 9.  The role of radionuclide probes for monitoring anti-tumor drugs efficacy: A brief review.

Authors:  Renata Salgado Fernandes; Carolina de Aguiar Ferreira; Daniel Cristian Ferreira Soares; Anna Margherita Maffione; Danyelle M Townsend; Domenico Rubello; André Luís Branco de Barros
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.529

10.  Rethinking cancer nanotheranostics.

Authors:  Hongmin Chen; Weizhong Zhang; Guizhi Zhu; Jin Xie; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Nat Rev Mater       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 66.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.