Literature DB >> 24817185

[Importance of PET in surgery of esophageal cancer].

K Ott1, T Schmidt, F Lordick, K Herrmann.   

Abstract

Perioperative or preoperative radiochemotherapy (RCTx) is nowadays standard for locally advanced esophageal cancer in Europe, as randomized studies have shown a significant survival benefit for patients with multimodal treatment. As responders and nonresponders have a significantly different prognosis, a response-based tailored preoperative treatment would be of utmost interest. An established method is a metabolic response evaluation by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET). The level of metabolic response is known to be dependent on the localization, tumor entity and type of preoperative treatment. Association of FDG-PET with later response and prognosis was shown for absolute standardized uptake values (SUV) or a decrease of SUV levels before and after therapy but there are also contradictory findings in the literature and no prospective validation. However, neither time points nor cut-off for metabolic response evaluation have been defined so far. The most interesting approach seems to be early response monitoring during preoperative chemotherapy, which has shown promising results in prospective single center trials (MUNICON I/II) during chemotherapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), but needs to be validated in prospective multicenter trails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24817185     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-013-2668-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  53 in total

1.  Monitoring of response to pre-operative chemoradiation in combination with hyperthermia in oesophageal cancer by FDG-PET.

Authors:  Marinke Westerterp; Jikke M T Omloo; Gerrit W Sloof; Maarten C C M Hulshof; Otto S Hoekstra; Hans Crezee; Ronald Boellaard; Walter L Vervenne; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Jan J B van Lanschot
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.914

2.  Phase 2 trial of induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly irinotecan and cisplatin followed by surgery for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  David H Ilson; Bruce D Minsky; Geoffrey Y Ku; Valerie Rusch; Nabil Rizk; Manish Shah; David P Kelsen; Marinela Capanu; Laura Tang; Jenny Campbell; Manjit Bains
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for evaluating early response during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with potentially curable esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Mark van Heijl; Jikke M Omloo; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Otto S Hoekstra; Ronald Boellaard; Patrick M Bossuyt; Olivier R Busch; Hugo W Tilanus; Maarten C Hulshof; Ate van der Gaast; Grard A Nieuwenhuijzen; Han J Bonenkamp; John Th Plukker; Miguel A Cuesta; Fiebo J Ten Kate; Jan Pruim; Herman van Dekken; Jacques J Bergman; Gerrit W Sloof; J Jan van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Prognostic significance of baseline positron emission tomography and importance of clinical complete response in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Akihiro Suzuki; Lianchun Xiao; Yuki Hayashi; Homer A Macapinlac; James Welsh; Steven H Lin; Jeffrey H Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Stephen G Swisher; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Preoperative therapy of esophagogastric cancer: the problem of nonresponding patients.

Authors:  S Blank; A Stange; L Sisic; W Roth; L Grenacher; F Sterzing; M Burian; D Jäger; M Büchler; K Ott
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Early metabolic response evaluation by fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography allows in vivo testing of chemosensitivity in gastric cancer: long-term results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Ken Herrmann; Florian Lordick; Hinrich Wieder; Wolfgang A Weber; Karen Becker; Andreas K Buck; Martin Dobritz; Ulrich Fink; Kurt Ulm; Tibor Schuster; Markus Schwaiger; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Bernd J Krause
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Predictive value of initial PET-SUVmax in patients with locally advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nabil P Rizk; Laura Tang; Prasad S Adusumilli; Manjit S Bains; Timothy J Akhurst; David Ilson; Karyn Goodman; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Correlation of molecular response as measured by 18-FDG positron emission tomography with outcome after chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  Andre A Konski; Jonathan D Cheng; Melvyn Goldberg; Tianyu Li; Alan Maurer; Jian Q Yu; Oleh Haluszka; Walter Scott; Neal J Meropol; Steven J Cohen; Gary Freedman; Louis M Weiner
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Impact of the introduction of integrated PET-CT into the preoperative staging pathway of patients with potentially operable oesophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  H M Salahudeen; A Balan; K Naik; S Mirsadraee; A F Scarsbrook
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  [Impact of (18)F-FDG PET/CT on the therapeutic management in the initial staging of the esophageal cancer].

Authors:  P Pifarré-Montaner; A Fernández-León; R de Juan; M E del Ama-Salvador; M Galán; C Gámez-Cenzano; M Sans
Journal:  Rev Esp Med Nucl       Date:  2009 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.