Literature DB >> 12105697

Observer study involving laser-digitized versus CCD-digitized images.

Kenneth W Clark1, William B Dawson, Edward Muka, Thomas K Pilgram, G James Blaine.   

Abstract

We compared laser- and CCD-digitized images for perceived image quality differences in a radiologist-observer study. Films of 50 two- and three-view studies (ankles, chests, c-spines, shoulders) were digitized on calibrated laser (Kodak Lumisys 75) and CCD (VIDAR SIERRA Plus) digitizers. Six radiologists independently compared digitized images on twin high-resolution monochrome monitors. Matching images were randomly presented on left/right monitors to support blinded comparisons. Observers scored image quality (for several diagnostic criteria) as "no different," left or right image "slightly" or "significantly" different. Of 7324 responses, 77.8% scored "no different" and 21.9% "slightly different" (5.9% favoring CCD, 16.0% favoring laser). In only 0.3% did observers score "significantly different." The Lumisys laser images were assessed as only slightly better than VIDAR SIERRA CCD images. Digitizer equipment-selection decisions can, therefore, be considered on the basis of price, reliability, support, ease-of-use, etc., rather than solely on the basis of image quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12105697     DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-5031-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  2 in total

1.  Evaluating noise in digitized radiographic images by means of histogram.

Authors:  Izabel Regina Fischer Rubira-Bullen; Maurício Cunha Escarpinati; Homero Schiabel; Marcelo Andrade da Costa Vieira; Cássia Maria Fischer Rubira; José Roberto Pereira Lauris
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  Diagnosing pneumonia in rural Thailand: Digital cameras versus film digitizers for chest radiograph teleradiology.

Authors:  Massoud Javadi; Ponglada Subhannachart; Sunisa Levine; Chomphunut Vijitsanguan; Sutarat Tungsagunwattana; Scott F Dowell; Sonja J Olsen
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 3.623

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.