Literature DB >> 19086771

Reinforcing effects of stimulants in humans: sensitivity of progressive-ratio schedules.

William W Stoops1.   

Abstract

Drug self-administration methodologies have been developed for use in humans to model naturalistic stimulant drug-taking behaviors. These methodologies use a number of schedules of reinforcement, including progressive-ratio schedules. As the name implies, in a progressive-ratio schedule, the response requirement for each subsequent delivery of drug increases, and the primary outcome variable is often the break point (i.e., the last ratio completed to receive a drug delivery). These schedules have been used in a number of human laboratory studies evaluating the reinforcing effects of stimulants. The results of these studies have demonstrated that progressive-ratio schedules are sensitive to manipulation of a pharmacological variable, dose, and to nonpharmacological variables contributing to stimulant drug effects. In addition, findings with progressive-ratio schedules are largely concordant with clinical findings, suggesting that drug self-administration under these schedules has predictive validity in terms of drug abuse and dependence. Future research is necessary, however, to understand better how pharmacological factors like route of administration, onset of effects, and pretreatment influence the reinforcing effects of stimulants under progressive-ratio schedules. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19086771      PMCID: PMC2753469          DOI: 10.1037/a0013657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 1064-1297            Impact factor:   3.157


  58 in total

Review 1.  Agonist-like, replacement pharmacotherapy for stimulant abuse and dependence.

Authors:  John Grabowski; James Shearer; John Merrill; S Stevens Negus
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 2.  Medications development: successes and challenges.

Authors:  Frank Vocci; Walter Ling
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Use of dopamine agonist pergolide in outpatient treatment of cocaine dependence.

Authors:  G R A Focchi; M C Leite; A G Andrade; S Scivoletto
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.164

4.  Cocaine-reinforced behavior in rats: effects of reinforcement magnitude and fixed-ratio size.

Authors:  R Pickens; T Thompson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Modulation of drug reinforcement by behavioral requirements following drug ingestion.

Authors:  K Silverman; K C Kirby; R R Griffiths
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Effects of buprenorphine on the self-administration of cocaine by humans.

Authors:  R.W. Foltin; M.W. Fischman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Methamphetamine self-administration by humans.

Authors:  C L Hart; A S Ward; M Haney; R W Foltin; M W Fischman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Reinforcing and subject-rated effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in non-drug-abusing humans.

Authors:  C R Rush; W D Essman; C A Simpson; R W Baker
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.153

9.  Smoked cocaine self-administration is decreased by modafinil.

Authors:  Carl L Hart; Margaret Haney; Suzanne K Vosburg; Eric Rubin; Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Nonmedical use of prescription stimulants among college students: associations with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder and polydrug use.

Authors:  Amelia M Arria; Kimberly M Caldeira; Kevin E O'Grady; Kathryn B Vincent; Erin P Johnson; Eric D Wish
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.705

View more
  22 in total

1.  Influence of acute bupropion pre-treatment on the effects of intranasal cocaine.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  Translational Assessment of Reward and Motivational Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Andre Der-Avakian; Samuel A Barnes; Athina Markou; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

3.  Amotivation in schizophrenia: integrated assessment with behavioral, clinical, and imaging measures.

Authors:  Daniel H Wolf; Theodore D Satterthwaite; Jacob J Kantrowitz; Natalie Katchmar; Lillie Vandekar; Mark A Elliott; Kosha Ruparel
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Using a dependent schedule to measure risky choice in male rats: Effects of d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and methamphetamine.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Nicholas A Prior; Marissa R Chitwood; Haley A Day; Jonah R Heidel; Sarah E Hopkins; Brittany T Muncie; Tatiana A Paradella-Bradley; Alexandra P Sestito; Ashley N Vecchiola; Emily E Wells
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 5.  Behind binge eating: A review of food-specific adaptations of neurocognitive and neuroimaging tasks.

Authors:  Laura A Berner; Samantha R Winter; Brittany E Matheson; Leora Benson; Michael R Lowe
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-03-29

6.  Human sex differences in d-amphetamine self-administration.

Authors:  Andrea R Vansickel; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Use of intracranial self-stimulation to evaluate abuse-related and abuse-limiting effects of monoamine releasers in rats.

Authors:  C T Bauer; M L Banks; B E Blough; S S Negus
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  High impulsivity in rats predicts amphetamine conditioned place preference.

Authors:  Justin R Yates; Julie A Marusich; Cassandra D Gipson; Joshua S Beckmann; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Anna R Reynolds; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 10.  Abuse liability assessment of tobacco products including potential reduced exposure products.

Authors:  Lawrence P Carter; Maxine L Stitzer; Jack E Henningfield; Rich J O'Connor; K Michael Cummings; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.