Literature DB >> 20148783

Human sex differences in d-amphetamine self-administration.

Andrea R Vansickel1, William W Stoops, Craig R Rush.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Women and men may respond differently to the effects of stimulants such as amphetamine and cocaine. AIM: In order to assess potential sex differences in the reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine, a retrospective-analysis was conducted on data collected from three studies that employed similar d-amphetamine self-administration procedures and used identical subject-rated drug-effect measures.
METHODS: Data from 10 women and 15 men were included in the analysis. In all studies, participants sampled placebo, low (8-10 mg) or high (16-20 mg) dose oral d-amphetamine. Following sampling sessions, participants worked for capsules containing one eighth of the previously sampled dose on a modified progressive-ratio schedule of reinforcement. We hypothesized that women and men would be differentially sensitive to the reinforcing effects of d-amphetamine. A two-way mixed-model analysis of variance (sex and dose) and planned comparisons were used in the statistical analyses.
RESULTS: The low dose of d-amphetamine functioned as a reinforcer in women, but not men, whereas the high dose of d-amphetamine functioned as a reinforcer in men, but not women. Men self-administered significantly more capsules under the high dose condition than women.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that men are more sensitive to the reinforcing effects of a high dose of d-amphetamine than women. Future research is needed that determines prospectively the reinforcing effects of weight-adjusted doses of d-amphetamine in women and men while controlling for menstrual cycle phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20148783      PMCID: PMC2857551          DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02858.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  24 in total

1.  Variations in affect following amphetamine and placebo: markers of stimulant drug preference.

Authors:  Frances H Gabbay
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Sex differences in the escalation of intravenous cocaine intake following long- or short-access to cocaine self-administration.

Authors:  Megan E Roth; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Limited sex differences in response to "binge" smoked cocaine use in humans.

Authors:  S M Evans; M Haney; M W Fischman; R W Foltin
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Choice between money and intranasal heroin in morphine-maintained humans.

Authors:  S D Comer; E D Collins; M W Fischman
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Reinforcing, subject-rated, performance and physiological effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in stimulant abusing humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Paul E A Glaser; Mark T Fillmore; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.153

6.  Reinforcing and subject-rated effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine in non-drug-abusing humans.

Authors:  C R Rush; W D Essman; C A Simpson; R W Baker
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.153

7.  Buprenorphine/naloxone reduces the reinforcing and subjective effects of heroin in heroin-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Ellen A Walker; Eric D Collins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Reinforcing effects of modafinil: influence of dose and behavioral demands following drug administration.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Mark T Fillmore; Paul E A Glaser; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Sex differences in cocaine-induced behavioral responses, pharmacokinetics, and monoamine levels.

Authors:  Eugene D Festa; Scott J Russo; Farhad M Gazi; Tipyamol Niyomchai; Lynne M Kemen; Shen-Nan Lin; Rodger Foltz; Shirzad Jenab; Vanya Quinones-Jenab
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.250

10.  Factors influencing the reinforcing and subjective effects of ephedrine in humans.

Authors:  L D Chait
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  A review of human drug self-administration procedures.

Authors:  Jermaine D Jones; Sandra D Comer
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 2.  Emergence of sex differences in the development of substance use and abuse during adolescence.

Authors:  Cynthia Kuhn
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 12.310

3.  Gender, brain-derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met, and frequency of methamphetamine use.

Authors:  Keith G Heinzerling; Steven Shoptaw
Journal:  Gend Med       Date:  2012-03-23

Review 4.  Sex and gender differences in substance use disorders.

Authors:  R Kathryn McHugh; Victoria R Votaw; Dawn E Sugarman; Shelly F Greenfield
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2017-11-10

5.  Sex Differences in Escalated Methamphetamine Self-Administration and Altered Gene Expression Associated With Incubation of Methamphetamine Seeking.

Authors:  Atul P Daiwile; Subramaniam Jayanthi; Bruce Ladenheim; Michael T McCoy; Christie Brannock; Jennifer Schroeder; Jean Lud Cadet
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.176

6.  Effects of adolescent nicotine exposure and withdrawal on intravenous cocaine self-administration during adulthood in male C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Price E Dickson; Mellessa M Miller; Tiffany D Rogers; Charles D Blaha; Guy Mittleman
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 4.280

7.  Relationship between oral D-amphetamine self-administration and ratings of subjective effects: do subjective-effects ratings correspond with a progressive-ratio measure of drug-taking behavior?

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; Anna R Reynolds; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  Amphetamine self-administration in light and moderate drinkers.

Authors:  Matthew D Stanley; Mégan M Poole; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Genotype-dependent effects of adolescent nicotine exposure on dopamine functional dynamics in the nucleus accumbens shell in male and female mice: a potential mechanism underlying the gateway effect of nicotine.

Authors:  Price E Dickson; Tiffany D Rogers; Deranda B Lester; Mellessa M Miller; Shannon G Matta; Elissa J Chesler; Dan Goldowitz; Charles D Blaha; Guy Mittleman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Abuse Potential of Oral Phendimetrazine in Cocaine-dependent Individuals: Implications for Agonist-like Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  B Levi Bolin; William W Stoops; Jeremy P Sites; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.