Literature DB >> 11512046

Methamphetamine self-administration by humans.

C L Hart1, A S Ward, M Haney, R W Foltin, M W Fischman.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Methamphetamine abuse has become increasingly problematic. Yet, the reinforcing effects of methamphetamine in humans have not been systematically evaluated.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize methamphetamine's reinforcing effects in human research participants under controlled laboratory conditions.
METHODS: Eight healthy research volunteers (one female, seven males) completed this 20-day residential study. On days 1, 5, 9, 13 and 17, at 1000 hours, participants received the "sample" oral dose of methamphetamine (0, 5, 10 mg) that was available for the next 3 days and they also received an alternative reinforcer, a $1 voucher (redeemable for cash at study's end). Over a 3-day period, volunteers participated in an eight-trial choice procedure, during which they had the opportunity to self-administer the dose of methamphetamine they most recently sampled or to receive the $1 voucher.
RESULTS: Participants' choice to self-administer methamphetamine significantly increased when active methamphetamine (5 mg and 10 mg) was available compared to placebo. No difference of choice was noted between low-dose and high-dose methamphetamine. However, the sampled 10 mg methamphetamine dose significantly increased several "positive" subjective ratings including "High," "Good Drug Effect," and "Stimulated," whereas the sampled 5 mg methamphetamine dose did not. Both active methamphetamine doses caused significant reductions in daily total caloric intake, relative to the respective placebo conditions.
CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that oral methamphetamine is a positive reinforcer in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11512046     DOI: 10.1007/s002130100738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  48 in total

1.  Methamphetamine self-administration in humans during D-amphetamine maintenance.

Authors:  Erika Pike; William W Stoops; Lon R Hays; Paul E A Glaser; Craig R Rush
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.153

Review 2.  The need for speed: an update on methamphetamine addiction.

Authors:  Alasdair M Barr; William J Panenka; G William MacEwan; Allen E Thornton; Donna J Lang; William G Honer; Tania Lecomte
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 3.  Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge; Morten L Kringelbach
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Neurocognitive effects of methamphetamine: a critical review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Cobb Scott; Steven Paul Woods; Georg E Matt; Rachel A Meyer; Robert K Heaton; J Hampton Atkinson; Igor Grant
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 5.  Pharmacogenetic treatments for drug addiction: cocaine, amphetamine and methamphetamine.

Authors:  Colin N Haile; Thomas R Kosten; Therese A Kosten
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.829

6.  Acute buspirone dosing enhances abuse-related subjective effects of oral methamphetamine.

Authors:  Erika Pike; William W Stoops; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Methamphetamine attenuates disruptions in performance and mood during simulated night-shift work.

Authors:  Carl L Hart; Amie S Ward; Margaret Haney; Jennifer Nasser; Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Incidence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections and risk factors for acquisition among young methamphetamine users in northern Thailand.

Authors:  Catherine G Sutcliffe; Apinun Aramrattana; Susan G Sherman; Bangorn Sirirojn; Danielle German; Kanlaya Wongworapat; Vu Minh Quan; Rassamee Keawvichit; David D Celentano
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.830

9.  Visual information processing in recently abstaining methamphetamine-dependent individuals: evoked potentials study.

Authors:  Jan Kremlácek; Ladislav Hosák; Miroslav Kuba; Jan Libiger; Jirí Cízek
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.379

10.  The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine does not alter total choices for methamphetamine, but may reduce positive subjective effects, in a laboratory model of intravenous self-administration in human volunteers.

Authors:  R De La Garza; J J Mahoney; C Culbertson; S Shoptaw; T F Newton
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.