Literature DB >> 7838915

Modulation of drug reinforcement by behavioral requirements following drug ingestion.

K Silverman1, K C Kirby, R R Griffiths.   

Abstract

Eight volunteers with histories of drug abuse participated in two experiments examining the modulation of drug choice by behavioral requirements following drug ingestion. Each morning subjects ingested color-coded capsules containing triazolam (0.25 mg), d-amphetamine (15 mg), or placebo and then engaged in a relaxation or a computer vigilance activity. Experiment 1 involved two phases (i.e. a triazolam and a d-amphetamine phase), presented in counterbalanced order. Within each phase, subjects were first exposed to each of two compounds (placebo and either triazolam or d-amphetamine) once with each activity. Then every other day for 20 days subjects chose which compound they ingested with the vigilance and relaxation activities, with the restriction that they could not choose the same compound with both activities. Seven of eight subjects reliably chose d-amphetamine with the vigilance activity; all subjects always chose triazolam with the relaxation activity. In experiment 2 (5 days' duration), after re-exposure to the color-coded compounds used in experiment 1, subjects chose which compound (placebo, d-amphetamine or triazolam) they ingested with the vigilance activity, and on another occasion (in counterbalanced order), which they ingested with relaxation activity. Seven of eight subjects chose d-amphetamine with the vigilance activity; all subjects chose triazolam with the relaxation activity. The relaxation and vigilance activities modulated triazolam and d-amphetamine reinforcement, thereby demonstrating a new class of environmental variable that can influence drug self-administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7838915     DOI: 10.1007/bf02244844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  11 in total

1.  Behavior maintained by termination of a schedule of self-administered cocaine.

Authors:  R D Spealman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Time-out from positive reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Modulation of elicited behavior by a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock presentation.

Authors:  W H Morse; R N Mead; R T Kelleher
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-07-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Medium isn't accurate 'Ice Age' message.

Authors:  P Cotton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990 May 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Maintenance of responding under a fixed-interval schedule of electric shock-presentation.

Authors:  J W McKearney
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-06-14       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Escape from self-produced rates of brain stimulation.

Authors:  S S Steiner; B Beer; M M Shaffer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Both positive reinforcement and conditioned aversion from amphetamine and from apomorphine in rats.

Authors:  R A Wise; R A Yokel; H DeWit
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-03-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Drug preference in humans: double-blind choice comparison of pentobarbital, diazepam and placebo.

Authors:  R R Griffiths; G E Bigelow; I Liebson; J E Kaliszak
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.030

9.  Morphine: conditioned increases in self-administration in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  S R Goldberg; J H Woods; C R Schuster
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Behavioral maintenance of high concentrations of blood ethanol and physical dependence in the rat.

Authors:  J L Falk; H H Samson; G Winger
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-09-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  24 in total

1.  Human behavioral pharmacology, past, present, and future: symposium presented at the 50th annual meeting of the Behavioral Pharmacology Society.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Harriet de Wit; Stephen T Higgins; Galen R Wenger; Chris-Ellyn Johanson; Mary Jeanne Kreek
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Replacing relative reinforcing efficacy with behavioral economic demand curves.

Authors:  Matthew W Johnson; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Amphetamine self-administration by humans: modulation by contingencies associated with task performance.

Authors:  S D Comer; M Haney; R W Foltin; M W Fischman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Acute effects of D-amphetamine on progressive-ratio performance maintained by cigarette smoking and money.

Authors:  Stacey C Sigmon; Jennifer W Tidey; Gary J Badger; Stephen T Higgins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-04-09       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Perhaps More Consideration of Pavlovian-Operant Interaction May Improve the Clinical Efficacy of Behaviorally Based Drug Treatment Programs.

Authors:  Joseph R Troisi
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2013

6.  Levels of neural progenitors in the hippocampus predict memory impairment and relapse to drug seeking as a function of excessive methamphetamine self-administration.

Authors:  Patrick Recinto; Anjali Rose H Samant; Gustavo Chavez; Airee Kim; Clara J Yuan; Matthew Soleiman; Yanabel Grant; Scott Edwards; Sunmee Wee; George F Koob; Olivier George; Chitra D Mandyam
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Assessing methylphenidate preference in ADHD patients using a choice procedure.

Authors:  Emily MacDonald Fredericks; Scott H Kollins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Methamphetamine self-administration by humans subjected to abrupt shift and sleep schedule changes.

Authors:  Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Margaret Haney; Suzanne K Vosburg; Sandra D Comer; Richard W Foltin; Carl L Hart
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Cocaine abuse versus cocaine dependence: cocaine self-administration and pharmacodynamic response in the human laboratory.

Authors:  Sharon L Walsh; Eric C Donny; Paul A Nuzzo; Annie Umbricht; George E Bigelow
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 10.  Reinforcing effects of stimulants in humans: sensitivity of progressive-ratio schedules.

Authors:  William W Stoops
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.