Literature DB >> 24961882

Memory search for the first target modulates the magnitude of the attentional blink.

Trafton Drew1, Ashley Sherman, Sage E P Boettcher, Jeremy M Wolfe.   

Abstract

The resolution of temporal attention is limited in a manner that makes it difficult to identify two targets in short succession. This limitation produces the phenomenon known as the attentional blink (AB), in which processing of a first target (T1) impairs identification of a second target (T2). In the AB literature, there is broad agreement that increasing the time it takes to process T1 leads to a larger AB. One might, therefore, predict that increasing the number of possible T1 identities, or target set, from 1 to 16 would lead to a larger AB. We were surprised to find that this manipulation of T1 difficulty had no influence on AB magnitude. In subsequent experiments, we found that AB magnitude interacts with T1 processing time only under certain circumstances. Specifically, when the T1 task was either well masked or had to be completed online, we found a reliable interaction between AB magnitude and the target set size. When neither of these conditions was fulfilled, there was no interaction between target set size and the AB. Previous research found that when the target set changes from trial to trial, trials with more possible targets elicited a larger AB. In the present study, the target set is held constant, reducing the demands on working memory. Nevertheless, AB magnitude still interacts with target set size, as long as the T1 task cannot be processed offline. Thus, the act of searching memory delays subsequent processing, even when the role of working memory has been minimized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24961882      PMCID: PMC4213293          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0440-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  29 in total

1.  Short-term memory and the attentional blink: capacity versus content.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

2.  Spreading the sparing: against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Christian N L Olivers; Stefan van der Stigchel; Johan Hulleman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-12-08

3.  Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs.

Authors:  Roger Bakeman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-08

4.  The simultaneous type, serial token model of temporal attention and working memory.

Authors:  Howard Bowman; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Data-limited manipulations of T1 difficulty modulate the attentional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2007-06

6.  Masking T1 difficulty: processing time and the attenional blink.

Authors:  Troy A W Visser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Direct evidence for a role of working memory in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Elkan G Akyürek; Bernhard Hommel; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

8.  The demonstration of short-term consolidation.

Authors:  P Jolicoeur; R Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Hybrid search in the temporal domain: Evidence for rapid, serial logarithmic search through memory.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  1 in total

1.  T1 difficulty does not modulate the magnitude of the attentional blink.

Authors:  Thomas M Spalek; Hayley E P Lagroix; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.138

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.